Car insurance

Tom

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
17,493
I was wondering.

Currently, insurance companies discriminate against policyholders based on their sex - generally speaking, women get cheaper insurance quotes than men.

This seems to be wholly accepted, and doesn't raise any real argument.

So what if a company used the same statistical calculations, but based upon race or religion rather than sex? Would this be a) socially acceptable, and b) a valid business proposal?

What if it could be demonstrated, statistically, that certain races/religions tended to cost the insurance company more or less money over the terms of policies?
 

old.user4556

Has a sexy sister. I am also a Bodhi wannabee.
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
16,163
Tom said:
Would this be a) socially acceptable, and b) a valid business proposal?

What if it could be demonstrated, statistically, that certain races/religions tended to cost the insurance company more or less money over the terms of policies?

a) no
b) no

As soon as someone dares mention something against colour/race in this country, they're shot down before they can finish their sentence.

It is perceived to be socially unacceptable (imo) in the UK to criticise minority race/colour in either a positive or negative way. For example:

"Black people are better at basketball than whites" - that sentence could/would make people wince and run for the PC hills.

"Jews crash more than christians, therefore we'll charge them more" - not a fucking chance. :)

My argument/examples is/are shit, but in general it wouldn't work.
 

Tom

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
17,493
But if the statistics were correct, how could people then argue that discriminating between men and women was valid?

I'm not bothered really, my insurance isn't that bad. Just wondered.
 

old.user4556

Has a sexy sister. I am also a Bodhi wannabee.
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
16,163
I think it's a reflection of society today, the "men v women" thing is a very live and let live scenario. Noone really cares that much to pursue it, particularly not men because men simply don't want to jeopardise the chance of a shag (basically).
 

leggy

Probably Scottish
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
3,838
Even if race X was proven to be a bigger risk (statistically) than race Y, I'm pretty certain that no businessman worth his salt would even dare risk the press by implementing a price structure based on race.

Can you imagine the sales hit?

I suppose it depends on whether it was a minority or a majority who were being discriminated against. Being that it is currently socially acceptable to discriminate against males (where car insurance is concerned).
 

Trem

Not as old as he claims to be!
Moderator
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,293
Its a crock of shit tbh. Samm crashes every 7 minutes and I haven't crashed since I was 20(13 years ago, her fault).

We have a roundabout at the end of our road and she even forgot to go around it once, and just the other month she crashed into the multi storey while parking and set off both airbags(passenger side went off because her bag was on the seat). That cost over a grand to put right.

Men are better drivers, end of argument. Women multi task and do it while they are driving - put make-up on, do their hair, decide whats for tea, check in the mirror every 3 seconds to see if a sexy fireman is driving behind, change Tampon, crash......ALWAYS CRASHING!!

I guess the statistics show that men have more crashes but surely thats because most of us pass our test quicker than women, hence more of us on the road.

:eek:

How can any woman not love me, I have a way with the ladies.
 

`mongoose

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Jan 9, 2004
Messages
957
I actually think that the insurance stuff is bollox tbh. Everyone should pay the same for their insurance irrespective of sex.

if you've got 5 years no claims and an unblemished driving record how can you be a worse driver or more unsafe driver than someone else with the same record?

it's bs tbh

M
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,391
Women do have more accidents than men that is a fact, however when men do it they do it properly and do more damage - that's where the insurance differences come from.
 

Trem

Not as old as he claims to be!
Moderator
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,293
More like the womens partners pay for the repairs rather than going through the insurance. Thats what I did anyway.
 

bob269

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
May 4, 2004
Messages
556
Trem said:
More like the womens partners pay for the repairs rather than going through the insurance. Thats what I did anyway.

You may be a better driver than Samm but at least she's still got a license :p
 

Alliandre

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
202
It's just one of those things I've sort of learned to accept. Like I'm younger, so I have to pay about four times more than the normal amount in insurance. I just plan on keeping my no claims bonus going so it won't be as expensive some day..
 

Trem

Not as old as he claims to be!
Moderator
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,293
I still got mine...........just :(
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,658
Actually, it does happen; not so much with car insurance, but plenty of other areas like medical and life, if they can find out your race, it goes into all acturial table calculations along with everything else. The only difference between this and the sexist car insurance is the marketing. This is one of the reasons why people are so worried about the ID card database; its a nice easy source of data to make all these calculations. Tie it to the NHS database, and if (when) the government starts selling the data, and its a happy day for the insurance companies.
 

GDW

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
688
Tom said:
What if it could be demonstrated, statistically, that certain races/religions tended to cost the insurance company more or less money over the terms of policies?

Insurance companies already do this in Northern Ireland! The vast majority of British Insurance companies do not operate in Northern Ireland for the following reasons
  • Northern Ireland law still allows whiplash claims to be made
  • carjacking and joyriding is rife in certain parts of the province
  • less important now as things are settling down but loss/damage as a result of terrorism

So there is an argument that drivers in Northern Ireland ,who are technically citizens of the United Kingdom, are not offered the same choice as our UK counterparts in England Scotland and Wales because as a race the Northern Irish are more risky to insure. The companies that do offer us insurance give us quotes which are way in excess of anywhere else in the UK
 

old.user4556

Has a sexy sister. I am also a Bodhi wannabee.
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
16,163
DaGaffer said:
Actually, it does happen; not so much with car insurance, but plenty of other areas like medical and life, if they can find out your race, it goes into all acturial table calculations along with everything else. The only difference between this and the sexist car insurance is the marketing. This is one of the reasons why people are so worried about the ID card database; its a nice easy source of data to make all these calculations. Tie it to the NHS database, and if (when) the government starts selling the data, and its a happy day for the insurance companies.

Good post Gaff.
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,391
Trem said:
I still got mine...........just :(

Dude, you need to phone the DVLA ASAP and tell them you have physically lost your licence.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom