Can you tell who got arrested for child porn offences yet?

[ECA]

Tie me kangaroo down mates. 82 year old australian internationally famous person arrested for kiddy stuff. Allegedly.

Could they tar him with a worse brush? Strokes like this could harm a mans reputation. Paint a bad picture of him if you will.

Didgerydont do stuff like this.

 

[Gwadien]

If true, this is going to be one of the biggest scandals since like, ever, due to his reputation and stuff.

 

[Ctuchik]

Are you asking if we know who it is or if it's ok to "name and shame"?

If true, this is going to be one of the biggest scandals since like, ever, due to his reputation and stuff.

As if it wasn't already considering all the others?

 

[ECA]

Are you asking if we know who it is or if it's ok to "name and shame"?

The title is a play on the catchphrase.
I just wanted to make puns.

 

[fettoken]

Can't be Paul Hogan. Ahh, long time since Strange Bedfellows was on.

 

[Tom]

Open secret in the media for ages. I could tell you things that would really get your chin wagging, but I'd get in trouble.

 

[Ctuchik]

Open secret in the media for ages.

They've done everything but actually naming him haven't they?

I love that about the media around the world. First they refuse to name the accused but then they give out such incredibly personal details it's impossible to not figure it out.

 

[rynnor]

They are worried about defamation claims - apparently he was first interviewed by the police a few months ago but no one reported it.

 

[Tom]

That's Leveson for you.

 

[Punishment]

Apparently two little boys were involved

 

[old.Tohtori]

The f*ck is going on?

 

[Olgaline]

Can't be Paul Hogan. Ahh, long time since Strange Bedfellows was on.

He's 73

 

[Olgaline]

30 sec on google however told me who it was..
name protection my ass

 

[Tom]

There is no protection. No court orders, nothing. Simply fear.

 

[Scouse]

Open secret in the media for ages. I could tell you things that would really get your chin wagging, but I'd get in trouble.

Not if you say "I heard this rumour - and it is just a rumour - but..."

 

[Edmond]

It will be interesting to see if they say tomorrow 'An 83 year old man is still being questioned'

 

[Job]

Well he was a porn actor in his early days

 

[Chilly]

Well he was a porn actor in his early days

Hah! Now that's a quality little factoid.

/edit - also strangely want to see some of it now. ~goes hunting~

 

[caLLous]

No porn. I did find this though.

 

[caLLous]

 

[DaGaffer]

Well he was a porn actor in his early days

What? Why am I finding that hard to believe?

 

[Deebs]

What? Why am I finding that hard to believe?

That's ok, Chilly will confirm if it is true....

Never heard that one myself to be honest.

 

[Job]

cant find anything myself..but many years ago i watched a documentary where he admitted to doing a few soft porn flicks for money

 

[Embattle]

Personally I've never liked the idea that anything should be known about such cases until after a trial, unless utterly required.

 

[Ormorof]

does his first name rhyme with Dolf?

 

[Olgaline]

nah golf

 

[Madmaxx]

who the fuck is it then

 

[Deebs]

Christ, let us play a game for the fucking thick, hi Madmaxx, think of Holf Rarris, swap the R & H.

 

[Exioce]

Open secret in the media for ages. I could tell you things that would really get your chin wagging, but I'd get in trouble.

This is one thing that's annoyed me over the last few months. Media types intimating that they knew or had strong suspicions all along, but had decided never to make an issue of it.
I can understand not wanting to act purely on rumours, but with Savile abusing children for decades and as lately as 2009, at which point does it become irresponsible, or collusion?

 

[Deebs]

Time to post in Random annoying things etc