They do do a shareware version with fewer features which works fine... not really placed to comment on levels of efficiency, but it does seem to do ok to my untrained eye
Yeah I use diskkeeper lite which does a lovely job of it, only annoying thing is it pops up a window occasionally which informs you of how fragmented your harddrive is, irrelevant of whether you want it to or not
Having used diskkeeper lite for quite a while I tried out O&O the other day. Despite having regularly de-fragged with diskkeeper I still got occasional disk-chugging and had put it down to a slow disk or big nasty game files. After defragging with O&O, however, I have noticed a significant improvement in system speed. I think, basically, diskkeeper reorganises fragmented files only whereas O&O does a much more thorough file re-shuffle to minimise seek times and so on.
So, after trying both, I think I am gonna buy a pro copy of O&O for 45 bucks.
Complete /name - seems to be the one for regular PCs
/access and /modified are geared towards servers.
I've tried /name on my win2k partition and my games one.
Playing 2x accounts of DAoC seems smoother, but that might be down to CleverCache which I'm trying aswell. Although I haven't had time to make proper tests yet.
Both of my disks are starting to crunch, so I'm getting ready for a low-level format. Is it worth formatting NTFS partitions to 4096bytes(allocation), is there much performance increase Vs 512bytes?
Tried o&o, its great, didnt realsie my disk was so fragmented. Nice smooth running system now, I think I will probably bu it after the trail period finishes.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.