Mckennitt said:heat is much lower than mine and i wouldnt risk to have it lower than 20+ since next patch fire wizzys gonna be a suprise dmg dealing mage and most important for me.
Mckennitt said:Iwan not bad template but i cant see in any way thats better than the one i posted. U do have higher spell duration and a bit of charisma. But overall u miss 3% power pool , heat is much lower than mine and i wouldnt risk to have it lower than 20+ since next patch fire wizzys gonna be a suprise dmg dealing mage and most important for me. U havent capped buff bonus. Most people say its not needed anyway but i guess is to what people likes and i do prefer to have it capped. One thing more though: i wouldnt imagine myself as bard and w/o gsv as vest. Sorry but thats just my opinion. The proc is sooo good to miss out and these templates are all about tricks.Just a difriend opinion ofc.
by that logic, drop any spell resis? -.-Bugz said:if your letting a caster free-cast on you then your a twit who deserves to die.
Carlos Bananos said:My bard has 18% buffbonus, 43+7 nurt and my con buff still doesnt cap :l
Bugz said:You all over-estimate the fire wiz situation. Alb groups are fucked in the sense it is incredibly hard for them to fit everything into a 8 man gg.
Sorc
Cleric
Cleric
BG Friar/Paladin
Theurg
Merc
Sorc
Caba
Posibily reaver/armsman...
are generally the only guys that fit into competitive set grps because they offer certain utility along with their essentials ie. caba offers nearsight (which is better than wiz's as tri-spec, disease), theurg offers unbeatable interrupts and sorc offers CC. You will see wiz's in PuG's but you should have no problem with PuG's. They may appear in a few set grps but then again, if your letting a caster free-cast on you then your a twit who deserves to die.