News 'Artificial life' created

Ch3tan

I aer teh win!!
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
27,318
We've already got skynet, now it seems Umbrella Corp is becoming a reality too.

So Arnie vs Mila. Who would win? Would Arnie's flesh over his exo skeleton be affected by the t-virus, or would he be immune? Would skynet be able to control Mila given her modifications?

These are all important questions that I demand we have answers to!
 

Jeros

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
1,983
Amazing! Its amazing how we are starting to make things that where/are science fiction a reality
 

Ctuchik

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
10,460
We've already got skynet, now it seems Umbrella Corp is becoming a reality too.

So Arnie vs Mila. Who would win? Would Arnie's flesh over his exo skeleton be affected by the t-virus, or would he be immune? Would skynet be able to control Mila given her modifications?

These are all important questions that I demand we have answers to!

arnie obviously, his flesh isnt important for survival :)

and no, Mila wouldn't be controllable because she isn't 100% machine. she still has a working brain, damaged as it may be :p
 

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
Amazing! Its amazing how we are starting to make things that where/are science fiction a reality

Actually we've been doing that for the past 20 years.

This IS the sci-fi age, people just take things like "call anyone anywhere anytime" for granted :p

Or how about vacuum sealed food?

Internet?

Super computers in every home?

Sliced bread?

arnie obviously, his flesh isnt important for survival :)

and no, Mila wouldn't be controllable because she isn't 100% machine. she still has a working brain, damaged as it may be :p

Points to add to this;

Also isn't arnies flesh not really flesh, but a high tech polymer of some soft?

And milla is infected already, she's not a machine, just bio enhanced.

On the issue of Milla vs Arnie though, have to go with milla as terminators get terminated by regular old humans too. Add super- to that human and it's red lights out.
 

ECA

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
9,439
well, atleast science can be proven, god have yet to show himself :)

And on the 7th day - God went to the vegas in the sky, got pissed - and had his kidneys extracted by the Kan'dan mafia group - unfortunately he didn't survive.

RIP God.

Kids - stay off alcohol.
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
Lets not go overboard - they have just stuck some extra bits in a bacteria - its not exactly artificial life.

It doesnt seem any more exciting than the sort of genetic engineering thats been going on for years to me?
 

dysfunction

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,709
Lets not go overboard - they have just stuck some extra bits in a bacteria - its not exactly artificial life.

It doesnt seem any more exciting than the sort of genetic engineering thats been going on for years to me?

It's quite different to regular genetic engineering.
They have made synthetic DNA and the bacteria "runs" according to that DNA rather than the usual tinkering with real DNA that is there already
 

Wij

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
18,221
It's quite different to regular genetic engineering.
They have made synthetic DNA and the bacteria "runs" according to that DNA rather than the usual tinkering with real DNA that is there already

I don't understand. DNA is just DNA. It's a molecular string. It can't be artificial or real. It just is. It could have been assembled artificially in the first generation but it's still DNA. Subsequent generations will have assembled their copies of this artificially-assembled DNA in the normal way. There's nothing artificial about them now except the historical origin of their genome.

Or have I missed something ?
 

Chilly

Balls of steel
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,046
You're not impressed by replacing the entire genome of a cell and reprogramming it? Replacing it, not with a genome from some fish cell, but one that was cooked up by hand, human hands, and then actually WORKED when dumped into a new cell.

ATM we just put in small fragments and use virii and stuff so propagate, now we can totally engineer any genome and plug the **** in.

VODKA GENERATING SLUDGE, DUDE!
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
I don't understand. DNA is just DNA. It's a molecular string. It can't be artificial or real. It just is. It could have been assembled artificially in the first generation but it's still DNA. Subsequent generations will have assembled their copies of this artificially-assembled DNA in the normal way. There's nothing artificial about them now except the historical origin of their genome.

Or have I missed something ?

And the 'artificial' gene is just a copy of the natural gene for that bacteria - still good media handling that group :p
 

dysfunction

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,709
They have chemically constructed the chromosomes and made the DNA...so I guess you are correct in that it is just DNA artificially constructed.

It is mightily impressive as that DNA could in theory do anything they want it to do
 

Athan

Resident Freddy
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
1,063
It's the entire sequence (not the DNA itself per se, as it's still using the same bases) of DNA in this thing that's artificial. Not just taking some extant vrius/bacteria and tweaking it a bit to suit. That's what the big deal is. It's proven we understand how DNA works sufficiently to write a 'biological program' from scratch.

How big a deal it will be in practice will be shown in the coming years (we might just end up redoing lots of stuff that evolution already produced, or we might come up with 'programs' that are entirely different and couldn't practically ever have evolved).
 

Athan

Resident Freddy
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
1,063
Also isn't arnies flesh not really flesh, but a high tech polymer of some soft?

No, it's real human flesh (from the point of view of the organisation of cells and what those cells are), but with an artificial life support system. It's all part of the "oh shit, they're from the future, couldn't they just bring uber weapons with them too?" fix-up of "oh, the time travel mechanism only works if there's a biological electric field present" or some-such other bullshit, which then required the robots to have a way to provide that ....

Don't think about it too hard, it really doesn't make any sense.
 

ECA

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
9,439
So somebody wrote Hello World in DNA terms, think how scary this stuff is going to be in 50 years time.

Medical science is going to be so much further forward*










*Probably won't be due to all the ethical restrictions in modern scientific research.
What's the harm in a little grave robbing/unleashing the plague now and then for a few lulz.
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
It's the entire sequence (not the DNA itself per se, as it's still using the same bases) of DNA in this thing that's artificial. Not just taking some extant vrius/bacteria and tweaking it a bit to suit. That's what the big deal is. It's proven we understand how DNA works sufficiently to write a 'biological program' from scratch.

No - thats not what was done - they just copied the natural genome - yes the copy was 'artificial' but thats it - it shows we can copy it does not demonstrate profound understanding.
 

dysfunction

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,709
No - thats not what was done - they just copied the natural genome - yes the copy was 'artificial' but thats it - it shows we can copy it does not demonstrate profound understanding.

Yes they copied it, constructed it and made it work. That may well be the "easy" bit but I doubt it will be too many years before they can actually make their very own one.

If you know how to construct something from parts someone else has made it, the next step is to make the individual parts yourself.
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
Yes, the 'shell' of it is from an existing bacterium, but the genome is entirely man-made.

I think your mis-understanding me - yes it was artificially created but its just a copy of the natural one.

To be a genuinely artificial lifeform it would need to be running on a genome we designed - it isnt.
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
Yes they copied it, constructed it and made it work. That may well be the "easy" bit but I doubt it will be too many years before they can actually make their very own one.

If you know how to construct something from parts someone else has made it, the next step is to make the individual parts yourself.

I think that small step may end up taking a looong time.
 

Athan

Resident Freddy
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
1,063
I think your mis-understanding me - yes it was artificially created but its just a copy of the natural one.

To be a genuinely artificial lifeform it would need to be running on a genome we designed - it isnt.

From Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome -- Gibson et al., 10.1126/science.1190719 -- Science

We report the design, synthesis, and assembly of the 1.08-Mbp Mycoplasma mycoides JCVI-syn1.0 genome starting from digitized genome sequence information and its transplantation into a Mycoplasma capricolum recipient cell to create new Mycoplasma mycoides cells that are controlled only by the synthetic chromosome. The only DNA in the cells is the designed synthetic DNA sequence, including "watermark" sequences and other designed gene deletions and polymorphisms, and mutations acquired during the building process. The new cells have expected phenotypic properties and are capable of continuous self-replication

(emphasis mine).

Although I do note the "1.08 Mbp" in the quote, which I hazard a guess means 1 million base pairs. It does seem unlikely at this point that all of this was designed from scratch. On the other hand I expect the scientists doing the work know it a lot better than any of us and this is indeed a significant step forward. Even if the majority of those 1.08 Mbp are straight copied from the bacterium it seems likely that a significant amount of the visibly functional genome is indeed artificial.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom