I
Ialkarn
Guest
- Thread starter
- #61
Originally posted by lofff
That " i dont need slam cos sum1 else in group will do that job" is a cheap argument... And albion had no end chant a few patchs ago by then u wouldnt say a pally-less group was gimped, CC and speed are the 2 "musts" for a group..
pps: gunz is gay.. irl.. etc
cheap argument? you play in a group and all got a different role.
No end chat ofc but still the best group insta heal of the game,group chants etc,all stuffs a s/s armsman don't have.
Originally posted by lofff
The weaponskill loose (dmg output, bonus to hit) from 50pole 50weapon to 50pole 39weapon aint noticeable at all neither, specially after a few realm ranks and buffed as u should b in rvr groups.. again a cheap argument...
Sorry but here you seem to ignore how weaponskill work:
if your target have 1 weaponskill point more than you his parry/block/evade rate 'll be greatly increased,and you ll have a less weaponskill than ALL tank classes in game whit a spec like that.
Originally posted by lofff
pure tanks (armsmen, warriors and heros) are the ONLY ones u can talk about been really SIMILAR. All of em have almost the same skills, all of em have the same rol, the differences are so tiny and insignificant..
Again.that is totally opinable: same role? armsmen can be offensive OR defensive heroes and Warriors are both ,whitout gimp themself;if that don't make difference in your eyes ...
Originally posted by lofff
About annihilation.. I am the one doing the stunning in my groups, no theres no hero assisting me to stun ppl.. anni is back positional yes, but its preety easy to land, costs half end than slam, hurts like hell and has an huge bonus to hit while slam has no bonus at all. anni > slam
well sorry but if you are the main stunner of your group,your group is gimped then,cause a positional stun its 100 times inferior as effectivness than a no time style stun.
then an armsman can spec 23 shield and get a 6 sec backstyle stun,but it wouldn't be like slam,and no your 50 style isn't like slam and no you can't be a properly main stunner in a group.
Originally posted by lofff
A full pole trying to defend his caster friend just whacks me while i kill his friend "hoping to kill me in time?" (sumtimes breaks a qcroot also been very helpfull..) An hybrid stuns me, casters flees taking range and nukes or does whatever his job is, f hybrid keeps on me (whacking) am alrdy worried bout my hps when stun wears off, f he doesnt cos he had sth better to do like killing my bard friend hes a clever player who saved his caster, nullified my defense on my bard, and killed my bard. Ill rather invite the hybrid to my group.
No one said a pure melee tank specced have to protect casters damn.you play in a group ppl have a role inside the group,someone sayng beserkers have to protect casters?no so why a pole tank specced should be gimped and respec to protect a caster when another class can do it better than him?
beserkers=main melee damage dealers of Midgard
pole users=main melee damage dealers of Albion
now don't come to say they are totally different,cause ofc they are but that is how things going.
Also in a group 2 meleer should ALWAYS stick togheter picking the same target,if not something is wrong ,cause except a beserker,no one is able to kill someone enought fast ,a caster who getting heals whit pbt can be a pain to kill or just require aloot of time,a thing who can put the group in troubles.
So tell me that:is better if picking a target are a slammer +a pure tank or a slammer+another slammer,bot not hight damage dealers?
the answer is obvious.