Are tilda the moderator using double standards of morality?

Status
Not open for further replies.
W

wrathofsauron

Guest
Judge for yourself there have been two threads with cheat accusations vs redguard and they are not locked on page four, in my eyes you do not qualify as a moderator, locking an exakt copy of an already open thread. Correct me if i'm wrong but you have been in trouble before.

I expect you to lock them immediately and if i see any more personal or guild related cheat accusations threads i expect them to be treated the same way from now on.
 
T

Tilda

Guest
ok, read guard thread locked, happy now?

bet that made you feel big, why would i be biased against hibs or mids when im an alb?
 
W

wrathofsauron

Guest
Originally posted by Tilda
ok, read guard thread locked, happy now?

Weee, on a more serious note treat all threads the same way then atleast i will be content.

bet that made you feel big, why would i be biased against hibs or mids when im an alb? [/B]


Maybe the Vengence zerg promised not to zerg you in emain?
who knows =)
 
T

Tilda

Guest
im sorry, im my eyes, you made the other the second thread just to continue a flame at VGN, i dont lock every flame thread because some have some sensible discussion in it, both of the recent two and just deterioated into flames.

When modding a thread i look at its content, now which realm posted it. SO if i see only spam or only flames i generally close it, if it has some constructive discussion then i'll probably leave it open.
There is no reason for me to tread threads about different people the same because i go on whats in the thread, now who wrote it.

Tilda
 
F

Fame

Guest
Originally posted by Exiled
fame, isnt that illegal in germany ?

i cant say for sure, maybe in east-germany, but you can go look if you get past the guard(s)!!!!
 
X

Xandax

Guest
Originally posted by Tilda
<snip>
When modding a thread i look at its content, now which realm posted it. SO if i see only spam or only flames i generally close it, if it has some constructive discussion then i'll probably leave it open.
There is no reason for me to tread threads about different people the same because i go on whats in the thread, now who wrote it.

Tilda

Without trying to do a moderator job here on BW - I do however fail to see how threads claiming that some guild cheat, withouth any indication of backing up such accusations can be considered "constructive discussion"

imo such threads should be locked the instant they spawn - but I also know that it seems to be the "BW-way" to flame and ridicule loads of people withouth any indications of a will to back up statements.
 
E

eneq

Guest
Originally posted by Xandax
Without trying to do a moderator job here on BW - I do however fail to see how threads claiming that some guild cheat, withouth any indication of backing up such accusations can be considered "constructive discussion"

imo such threads should be locked the instant they spawn - but I also know that it seems to be the "BW-way" to flame and ridicule loads of people withouth any indications of a will to back up statements.

ofc it can b constructive discussions. Why cant it ?
If i say guild X cheatc CAUSE they did this and they did that.

And that guild response saying "we did this cause we got info from x"

Then the first guy can say "aaah Soz my fault"...

Or he can say "thats not true cause..."

And if 100 peeps saying the same thing about 1 guild doesnt prove that the guild cheats BUT peeps reading and judging the discussion can make up there own minds about the whole affair....

All discussions can b constructive exept when trollers like loff and novamir tries to interfere with juvenile sexisth (sp) comments...
 
T

Tilda

Guest
theres a difference,

i could accuse someone of cheating, thats fine, it will stay unlocked, when it deteriorates into flames, it gets locked.

i think thats what i want to say, but got a splitting headache atm
:(

Tilda
 
E

Exiled

Guest
Originally posted by Tilda
theres a difference,

i could accuse someone of cheating, thats fine, it will stay unlocked,

but when other ppl do it..... it gets locked ?
 
T

Tilda

Guest
no, making cheating accusations is fine,

when its a flame, its not.

yes i realise the thread i closed was an accusation, it was also a consealed flame from the thread brinx closed, thus it was closed.

Tilda
 
E

eneq

Guest
Originally posted by Exiled
but when other ppl do it..... it gets locked ?

If you refering to Wrathofsauron then even a dummy account should c that it was intended as a flamethread from start...
OR did you fail to realise he just copied Tyka post and used it to flame VNG ?

I really hope you didnt refered to that.
But why not quote or link so peeps can understand you better ?

Who is other people ? and wich thread got locked due to accuse someone for cheating ?
 
E

Exiled

Guest
it wasnt directed at any ppl, just that tilda said when HE accuses someoen of cheating or whine it will remain unlocked, but when other ppl do, it gets a big grey padlock on it, just saying thats all.... <walks off whistling>
 
T

Tilda

Guest
it dosnt though.

if my whine thread got loads of flames on it, it would get closed too.

FLAMES are the main reason a thread like that would get closed, its the smae for everybody, guardxmens thread was slightly different because it was a poorly discuised flame attempt in its self.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom