Anonimity? pfft.

[Tom]

http://www.itcontractor.com/Articles_IR35_News_Advice/view_article.asp?id_no=2368&photopage=0

Be warned

 

[Will]

At least its the user who posted getting sued, rather than the website.

 

[Louster]

So who knew that 49 views of a bunch of text on some website could stir up so much shit, eh? Internet sure is Serious Business.
I wonder if he would have still been sued if he'd just stuck "allegedly" in all over the place.

(PS: anonymity.)

 

[nath]

Or howabout a clause that says that anything posted on the forums are merely opinions. You can't sue someone for an opinion (can you?).

 

[Escape]

The claims were described in a high court statement yesterday as... "a grave slur on Mr Smith's personal and professional integrity".

Sounds like a regular forum flame!

 

[leggy]

The interaction of HIV and T blood cells is more interesting.

 

[tris-]

FH sure do love their HIV

 

[Bullitt]

FH sure do love their HIV

Top dog for music games and videos!

Disclaimer: the above is a trademark slogan of HMV and its respective owners bla bla bla etc