Dimse Dut said:and ELitestoner: Cuting and pasting doesnt illustrate a point. It just shows you couldnt think of a reply on your own.
Phule_Gubben said:
Isn't there a leetserver you could join perhaps?
Elitestoner said:yeah ok, ill do that, cheers, you sure showed me
Vonwar said:I fully understand your wondering. I can only spit in contempt on those cowards, and be ashamed that they belong to our realm. I hope they had a good reason for not killing the hibs, but it is hard to know if you were not there yourself.
It smells of opted rvr guild/group or something, i have seen it before, running in hib frontier with a low rr casual guild group, we meet some hibs (high rr opted ones) we attack them, after that we are killed we notice that another mid group have been watching the whole scenery and wave to the hibs, whereafter both the mid and the hib group leave the spot, only to meet in a private 8 vs. 8 battle.
I was totally pissed, that another group from the same realm letting realm mates die, just in order to keep the 8 vs. 8 appointment they obviously had with the hib group.
They even flamed us hereafter that we should p i s s off from their battlefield. Im sorry but i thought we were on the same side, not on opposite.
The way i was brought up in this game, and the way i play it, is:
A good enemy is a dead one, no matter what, or put in another way be to others like you want them to be to you, (i never get spared, only killed.)
"Adding is an artificial word made up by opted RvR groups, not to the benefit of the realm"
The correct synonymous for "Adding" can only be "Fire Support".
I only could wish that you had posted the names of the mid traitors, that did not kill the hibs so the rest of us can be warned about fellow realm mates NOT doing their job.
Rgds.
Vonwar
Guildmaster Danish Huscarls.
Vonwar said:I fully understand your wondering. I can only spit in contempt on those cowards, and be ashamed that they belong to our realm. I hope they had a good reason for not killing the hibs, but it is hard to know if you were not there yourself.
It smells of opted rvr guild/group or something, i have seen it before, running in hib frontier with a low rr casual guild group, we meet some hibs (high rr opted ones) we attack them, after that we are killed we notice that another mid group have been watching the whole scenery and wave to the hibs, whereafter both the mid and the hib group leave the spot, only to meet in a private 8 vs. 8 battle.
I was totally pissed, that another group from the same realm letting realm mates die, just in order to keep the 8 vs. 8 appointment they obviously had with the hib group.
They even flamed us hereafter that we should p i s s off from their battlefield. Im sorry but i thought we were on the same side, not on opposite.
The way i was brought up in this game, and the way i play it, is:
A good enemy is a dead one, no matter what, or put in another way be to others like you want them to be to you, (i never get spared, only killed.)
"Adding is an artificial word made up by opted RvR groups, not to the benefit of the realm"
The correct synonymous for "Adding" can only be "Fire Support".
I only could wish that you had posted the names of the mid traitors, that did not kill the hibs so the rest of us can be warned about fellow realm mates NOT doing their job.
Rgds.
Vonwar
Guildmaster Danish Huscarls.
xxManiacxx said:if u can´t handle a 8vs8 don´t run with only 8?
Since when are you speaking for 'most people' on the cluster? I very much doubt you represent the majority at all, you just represent the loudest element on forums. There are ~1500-2000 people on the cluster primetime and about 150 are running 8v8 groups (being kind and assuming 5fg per realm + a few bots). Doesn't sound like a majority to me.Chamie said:<snip long and rambling bollocks>
Oh, my god. You actually believe that?This game would have faded away a long time ago had it not been for the fg vs fg action. Mindless zergs become boring.
the majority would have left this game years ago thenchretien said:Eruptix:
Oh, my god. You actually believe that?
I thought you were being ironic or something.
The elitist attitude in RvR is what is killing this game (which is bound up a lot - although not exclusively - with the FGvFG scene).
I guarantee that if RvR was more active with more epic battles going on, this game would have a lot more attraction to new players. Much more casual friendly 'end game', much more chance to take part in big realm events.
Mindless zergs can be boring but who says a zerg has to be mindless? What's wrong with zerging for an objective? That's why there are realm missions, that's why Mythic piles everyone into the same area and lets them go at each other, because it's designed to be AlbvMidvHib not Maelstrom v PE and NFD v Synergy etc.
You've completely not understood the point. Fg RvR is a tiny minority of the action on the server. The only reason it doesn't appear that way is because the people who prefer that are the loudest on forums and are constantly reinforcing each other's perception that this is where it's at. Imagine there was no FH, no IRC, no way to communicate with other players except ingame about ingame stuff, would you still hold that view? I very much doubt you would, you'd be one of a small number of hardcore players complaining that the casuals were ruining your fun. Oh, wait....Eruptix said:the majority would have left this game years ago then
in the end,mindless zergs etc ARE boring,its always the same..no challenge etc
and yes,im 100% sure that fg rvr is what keeps this game alive,and not "hi2U we run 5fg on stick cause we cant compete with 1" rvr
Chamie said:the majority is against zerging
chretien said:You've completely not understood the point. Fg RvR is a tiny minority of the action on the server. The only reason it doesn't appear that way is because the people who prefer that are the loudest on forums and are constantly reinforcing each other's perception that this is where it's at. Imagine there was no FH, no IRC, no way to communicate with other players except ingame about ingame stuff, would you still hold that view? I very much doubt you would, you'd be one of a small number of hardcore players complaining that the casuals were ruining your fun. Oh, wait.....
chretien said:And the reason for running 5fg on stick isn't because they can't compete with 1, it's because they want to achieve something that takes 5fg (or more). However like everything else, that just utterly passed you by
Fyric said:The only thing that really requires more than 1fg is taking a relic though.. so what exactly is it you're trying to achieve with the 5fg?.
If Mythic intented the game to be all epic battles/mindless zerging depending on your view, why didnt they set groupsize to 40?
eggy said:A groupsize of 40? 8 players is probably the optimal to balance damage, healing etc. It would be chaos with anything larger.
Fyric said:exactly my point
Fyric said:If the FG vs FG scene is the minority, how is it exactly that these players earn 3x the rps of everyone else, since the FG's only fight the FG's and the various adds.
The only thing that really requires more than 1fg is taking a relic though.. so what exactly is it you're trying to achieve with the 5fg?.
If Mythic intented the game to be all epic battles/mindless zerging depending on your view, why didnt they set groupsize to 40
Eruptix said:the majority would have left this game years ago then
in the end,mindless zergs etc ARE boring,its always the same..no challenge etc
and yes,im 100% sure that fg rvr is what keeps this game alive,and not "hi2U we run 5fg on stick cause we cant compete with 1" rvr