Alb's don't zerg?

[Qte Eth]

1fg la and 2fg of vengeance are called ZERG this days?ROFL
and roflmao at 2fg la
and lol at albs who think hibs are THAT stupid that will KEEP coming in 1fg to give them easy rps
they just come in 2fg and beat all 5fg zerlings coz ppl who are in that zergs dont know what to do, but press f8 and stick

hibs have moved in 1fg size for good 6 months now ,albs are zerging for same amount of time ,and u albs still say hibs are zergins same as albs ?
LOL

 

[Tharion]

OMG PLZ LOL !!!

It looks so retarded.
Some of you use "LOL" 1000 times in 1 sentance(sp?).

If you don't want to zerg, get zerged - then don't go to Emain.
Go to Odins or HW.

 

[Puppetmistress]

Originally posted by Qte Eth
1fg la and 2fg of vengeance are called ZERG this days?ROFL
and roflmao at 2fg la
and lol at albs who think hibs are THAT stupid that will KEEP coming in 1fg to give them easy rps
they just come in 2fg and beat all 5fg zerlings coz ppl who are in that zergs dont know what to do, but press f8 and stick

hibs have moved in 1fg size for good 6 months now ,albs are zerging for same amount of time ,and u albs still say hibs are zergins same as albs ?
LOL

If you relate it to realm-population (you know, that thing you guys always whine about: But Albion has the numbers!) thus:

realm-population / zerg-population = Around the same for Alb as for Hib.

Where most Albs are like RR2-RR3 and most Hibbies are RR5-RR6 in that zerg.

kthnxbye

 

[Tyka]

In the beginning it was groups of 3-4 ppl, i remember when playing my hero that we ran around with another hero and bard, killing ppl in small groups, sometimes fgs.

Times changed, groups became bigger, usually 1fg running around to have a chance in emain, everyone had to changed their play style if they wanted to have some fun/rps in emain.

Nowadays, (getting more and more zerg friendly since all the patches) if you dont have at least 1fg of very balanced players or 2fgs, just forget emain.

Since all clueless/lazy albs started gathering at amg and start their massive 3-4 fg zerg while there was only 1 fg hibs in emain roaming, more and more people started to zerg, and gather more and more full groups.

Tbh i don't think VGN ever will run around with more than 2fgs in emain, it's just too much hassle for the organisers each day, balancing groups etc, this is how far it goes for us.

My last sentence about this matter (zerging) is: We zerg yes, but you started with it and this is what you will get, deal with it and stop moaning, people will keep on do whatever it takes to get rps in this game.

 

[Aussie-]

hf "organising" your 2FG every day

 

[Tyka]

at least we don't eat dirt 90% of the time in rvr when we meeting even numbers of enemys, aussie :hat:

 

[old.Wildfire]

lol @ tyka

missed the point, overshot the runway, crashed and burned in the woodland beyond

 

[Aussie-]

Oh no Tyka you got it all wrong m8, this game counts the rp's, not the deaths

 

[Tyka]

well, not sure what you mean but, if you want to proof that we zerg, then ok we zerg in 2fgs.

 

[bracken_woodman]

Originally posted by Tyka
We zerg yes

Tyka NOOOOOOOO! Don't sell your soul and admit that Hibs zerg! Just keep repeating the mantra "Hibs don't zerg, we use skill and tactics!" and you'll soon get better. Come on, I'll help you, join in with me "Hibs don't zerg..."

 

[Rollie_David]

Originally posted by Tyka
2fgs.

albs have than in infiltrators alone following the main zerg, then you still have to add on the scouts and solo minstrels

 

[belth]

If Albs have 1 fg of Infiltrators, you can bet your ass, mother future income and little sister that Mids got 1.5 fg.

Go play on Duskwave to see numbers...

 

[Rollie_David]

Class statistics for server Excalibur
Class Characters

5 Shadowblade 802
6 Infiltrator 1,010

 

[Trinilim]

Originally posted by dune
Class statistics for server Excalibur
Class Characters

5 Shadowblade 802
6 Infiltrator 1,010

about 600 of those infiltrators are lvl 30 and below, I can guarentee you. most of us get sick of rvring with regular chars and make infil alts for BG.

 

[belth]

74 lvl50 infils and 115 lvl50 sbs.

You need to be more attentive Dune. Much more.

 

[Rollie_David]

i didnt have time to check the lv50's i should have really, add your scouts onto that and that will take u above active sb's

 

[Aule Valar]

and when you add hunters to make up for scouts....

nice post again by qte, hibs only move around in emain in 1fg for the last 6months, yet strangly at the same time they don't go out into emain in 1fg anymore to give us easy rps but in 2fgs?

this leaves me confused

and tyka may be right that we started it, but thats imaterial now, zerging is just whats done, if you don't want zergs you could try pvp, then the zerg will just get bored rapidly and kill itself

 

[old.Odysseus]

i didnt have time to check the lv50's i should have really, add your scouts onto that and that will take u above active sb's

Add runies and skalds and its a bigger number than cabalists. Your point?

 

[Trinilim]

Originally posted by Aule Valar
and when you add hunters to make up for scouts....

nice post again by qte, hibs only move around in emain in 1fg for the last 6months, yet strangly at the same time they don't go out into emain in 1fg anymore to give us easy rps but in 2fgs?

this leaves me confused

and tyka may be right that we started it, but thats imaterial now, zerging is just whats done, if you don't want zergs you could try pvp, then the zerg will just get bored rapidly and kill itself

believe it or not, they've been spotted in 3, and even 4, and sometimes even 5+ fgs!!

 

[Rollie_David]

my point was for every alb zerg there is at least a fg of stealthers following it up, i actually made the initial post for a bit of fun but by the responses i struck a nerve

 

[Tyka]

Originally posted by Aule Valar
and tyka may be right that we started it, but thats imaterial now, zerging is just whats done, if you don't want zergs you could try pvp, then the zerg will just get bored rapidly and kill itself

Imaterial? That's how it is, deal with it. People will do whatever is needed to get rps.

 

[Tranquil-]

And I thought everyone had noticed that every realm zergs. Logics isn't easy to get..



<shakes head>

 

[bracken_woodman]

Originally posted by Tyka


Imaterial? That's how it is, deal with it. People will do whatever is needed to get rps.

Yup like the man said, its "imaterial" who started it (of course should be immaterial, but thats beside the point ).

To be honest, coming out with "We zerg yes, but you started it" reminds me of my long gone school days. In the playground. The fights that would always end with the snotty-nosed 12 year old pointing at me and saying "He started it" when the teacher asked us what was going on whilst holding us both by the ears (they can't do that now kids!). It didn't make any difference then who started it (we still both got the bollocking), and it doesnt make any difference now...

 

[Tyka]

Bracken is that little kid you? cause you wont see me arguing about who zergs and who does not, all 3 realms zerg.

It's just a bad circle, ppl loose in rvr - > get more ppl - > gank enemy - > enemy gets more people - > in the end, albs win, because they have superior numbers.

 

[bracken_woodman]

Originally posted by Tyka
Bracken is that little kid you? cause you wont see me arguing about who zergs and who does not, all 3 realms zerg.

It's just a bad circle, ppl loose in rvr - > get more ppl - > gank enemy - > enemy gets more people - > in the end, albs win, because they have superior numbers.

Um read my post again, as you seem to have lost the plot somewhere. I was simply following your line of posts -

Post 1: Tyka "We zerg yes, but you started it" - Irrelevant point.
Post 2: Aule "Tyka may be right who started it, but that's imaterial now..." - Correct point.
Post 3: Tyka "Imaterial?..." - Questioning Aule's point.
Post 4: Bracken "Yup, like the man said, its imaterial...". - Putting Tyka straight point.

Understand the sequence now? Good. The rest of my post was just demonstrating how childish your initial point was i.e. the old "you started it" routine, in a clumsy attempt to maintain the moral high-ground. As you said, all realms zerg. End of story. It matters not one jot who started it, or what excuses you can come up with to try and justify why hibs zerg. Trying to blame albs for the choices you make is pathetic.

 

[Tyka]

Err, if you think i'm immature when i say "you started zerging", well fine thats your pov. That's a whole different matter btw. But at least i don't moan when i get zerged, i deal with it, who's the baby?

 

[bracken_woodman]

Originally posted by Tyka
Err, if you think i'm immature when i say "you started zerging", well fine thats your pov. That's a whole different matter btw. But at least i don't moan when i get zerged, i deal with it, who's the baby?

Totally agree with you on that one - whining about zerging is pointless, and you won't find a single post where I complain about a zerg What I get riled about is when people write bs saying only albs zerg, or albs started it, or hibs don't zerg blah blah blah. That's when I respond.

 

[belth]

Originally posted by dune
my point was for every alb zerg there is at least a fg of stealthers following it up, i actually made the initial post for a bit of fun but by the responses i struck a nerve

No, you just talked out of "where the sun doesn't shine" because you didn't bother to check your so called "facts" and wrote something that only someone clueless can write, relying on the population imbalance question.

And for every mid zerg there's 2fg of sb's and 1.5fg of buffbots at the pk. Actually you don't need the mid zerg.

 

[Rollie_David]

Originally posted by belth


No, you just talked out of "where the sun doesn't shine" because you didn't bother to check your so called "facts" and wrote something that only someone clueless can write, relying on the population imbalance question.

And for every mid zerg there's 2fg of sb's and 1.5fg of buffbots at the pk. Actually you don't need the mid zerg.

nerve struck