I'm on the brink of selling a property in France. The potential buyer is currently renovating their house in England and will retire in 2017 but wouldn't be ready to move out until the year after that probably.
They are in a position where they can get about 60% of the monies together without borrowing so what they want is to stake their claim on this house right now because they like it so much, and have me continuing to live here and caretake for the foreseeable until they're ready to up sticks in England and move out here. I'm thinking of buying a plot of land and building something and this came up in the discussion. They then went away and returned today with an idea that they would first of all pay a deposit to get me to take it off the market, then buy the plot of land, pay for the building costs, and at the end pay the difference owed (which would still be significant - there's no way that their outlay would be higher than the value of this place so there's no risk there for me or them). Then we would essentially swap the properties.
This sounds like a bizarre way of doing things to me but is it a sound proposal? I need to speak to the notaire about it in the week and see what's what. The potential buyer paints it as a very low-risk way of achieving what we both want. At the end of the day, if it all went tits up I would still have this house and they would have the new build. Something just seems fishy about the whole thing but I can't pick any holes in it.
They are in a position where they can get about 60% of the monies together without borrowing so what they want is to stake their claim on this house right now because they like it so much, and have me continuing to live here and caretake for the foreseeable until they're ready to up sticks in England and move out here. I'm thinking of buying a plot of land and building something and this came up in the discussion. They then went away and returned today with an idea that they would first of all pay a deposit to get me to take it off the market, then buy the plot of land, pay for the building costs, and at the end pay the difference owed (which would still be significant - there's no way that their outlay would be higher than the value of this place so there's no risk there for me or them). Then we would essentially swap the properties.
This sounds like a bizarre way of doing things to me but is it a sound proposal? I need to speak to the notaire about it in the week and see what's what. The potential buyer paints it as a very low-risk way of achieving what we both want. At the end of the day, if it all went tits up I would still have this house and they would have the new build. Something just seems fishy about the whole thing but I can't pick any holes in it.