N
nath
Guest
is fucking shit.
genre busting classic? hardly!
discuss.
genre busting classic? hardly!
discuss.
Originally posted by Ono
Yep - it's a British film so must be bollocks.
Originally posted by the-frizz
Saw it on Thursday. I'd say it was a good idea but poorly done. Though i did like the camera work.![]()
Originally posted by Ono
Yep - it's a British film so must be bollocks.
Originally posted by prime1
seeing Manchester in flames because " no firecrews to put them out" was also good.
Originally posted by prime1
I thought it was very good, had sum good tension, although it left you wanting to know more about what had happeend during the first 28 days etc
Its not a remake, but its kind of like a cross between day of the triffids and resident evil.
Acting is fine. although the main character needed more to him, the direction is superb, as is teh camera work, seing a desolated empty london gthat isnt CG and full of shitty dragons is also "nice", seeing Manchester in flames because " no firecrews to put them out" was also good.
Dont go in expecting a fuckin super wonderful spiffing film, its a "low" budget zombie flick, but its one done by a british director, with a british cast etc, so its got no fucking annoying gun toting yanks in it.
And the zombies run and jump etc
Empire gave it 4* and thats all u need to know as far as film reviews go.
Originally posted by prime1
The preview CD is strangely edited its not like that in the film.
And i only clicked submit once, not my fault that either
a) these forums are shit or
b) my work office connection/PCs are fucked.
Originally posted by prime1
Empire gave it 4* and thats all u need to know as far as film reviews go.
Originally posted by Nos-
Hay!!
Why not try deleting one of your posts????!!!?///