1.62 Savage OR Pre 1.62 Zerk

C

chimaira

Guest
What would u prefer to meet in rvr as a hib/alb

and what would u prefer to play as a mid?

discuss
 
B

Brelakor.

Guest
Id play a zerk, it just suits me more.
Tho i am rolling one too :p
 
T

TaF

Guest
Well as a cleric i prefer savages, they dont have PF so i still have chance to run after i purge their stun, PF doesn't have a goddamn immunity timer so u get it non stop, so zerkers with PF is a no go :s

Doesn't matter which one, MA train beats me anyway :s
 
O

[Oo]Escape

Guest
It's not just Savages but the evolution of RvR which has made it this bad. Savages are in capped SC, TG weapons, uncapped stats and fully buffbotted + 4x assist train per group

I don't remember zerkers running like that.
 
F

froler-mid

Guest
savage, thrust dmg type, perma end, self haste, self dps shout and the list goes on....:D
 
D

Damon_D

Guest
I think I would prefere to play the Easterbunny...unlimited surply of trowing egg's aka ranged attack, special move aka double kick to the groin , speed , high evade and fluffy armor
 
L

Laston

Guest
isin´t it zerker/SB btw? both are affected...
 
K

kalgarn

Guest
Originally posted by Laston
isin´t it zerker/SB btw? both are affected...
Click to expand...
not if he's comparing the two light tanks in mid...
 
G

Garnet

Guest
zerkers because they are alot more killable, even though they can hurt alot, especially Soruzi, uff :)
 
O

old.mattshanes

Guest
Pre-nerfed zerk simply because there wasn't as much of them as savages and easier to kill...
 
D

Danya

Guest
Zerk - you don't have to deal with 50% 360 evade, thrust damage type, melee resists near 50% etc. :p
 
Z

zapzap

Guest
Then gimme back zerkers FGS. savages not as good if u ask me, PF is nice and berserker damage was stedy uber damage.
I remember this summer when we had 3 berserker 1 warrior 3 healers 1 shammy group nothing comes close to it now, and we have higher RR ect now.

Grizlas didnt even need to whiiine coz loosing was when ?

Thats says all.

Zapsi
 
G

grizlasthehero

Guest
I STLONG WHINE EVEN IF NOT NEEDED U KNOW THAT
 
D

Drum'N'Base

Guest
Originally posted by Garnet
zerkers because they are alot more killable, even though they can hurt alot, especially Soruzi, uff :)
Click to expand...

soru gona hurt u alot soon, with his pole :p
 
J

Jaem

Guest
hmmm, prefered playing my zerker pre 1.62 and now compared to the h2h savage I gave up on.

Just seem'd to me

h2h = high vareince in dmg, stupid miss rate.
la = roughly same dmg all the time, with hardly any misses.
 
C

chimaira

Guest
Myself I preffered those 1on1 fights vs zerkers.

My advantage: chain slash neutral
their advantage: DAMAGE

and that pretty well even out.
I NEVER had any problems fighting zerkers and some fights where just great fun.

Savages on teh other hand. I dont really think mids prefer them over zerkers from the days. just they dont have much choice.
and well that bcuz mids dont wanna hit like normal lighttanks aka merc/Bm. they need to 2 shot clerics to cum irl!! :p
 
L

Litmus

Guest
I would prefer playing my 1.60 zerk anyday over a savage :eek:
 
D

Dorin

Guest
Originally posted by chimaira

and well that bcuz mids dont wanna hit like normal lighttanks aka merc/Bm. they need to 2 shot clerics to cum irl!! :p
Click to expand...


:clap: yes, straight to the point ^^
 
O

old.Bubble

Guest
i'd rather face a savage than a pre nerf zerker...

The good Zerkers hit constantly for 800ish (thats with my capped slash resist)
Savages hit for anything from 120 to 600, they are only feared now because theres 3 of them, instead of the 1 good one.
 
B

Brelakor.

Guest
Does two shotting clerics make you cum irl?
If so that must be the reason we have so many savages.

Off to roll a savage :eek:
 
I

ilum

Guest
I'll take a post 1.62 zerk and a post 1.65 savage

kthxbye
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top Bottom