S
A
Arnor
Guest
- Thread starter
- #2
gif Z3rker LOOOOOVEEEEEE!
A
**Aligro**
Guest
- Thread starter
- #3
"However, we are keeping part of the capping changes: We've raised the player stat caps so that high level buff spells will not exceed the cap. Players who receive high level buff spells from friendly casters will notice this change the most. This means that races that a high starting stat (such as strength or dexterity) will now be able to buff it a bit more than those races that do not have a high starting stat."
good news for buffbot users
good news for buffbot users
O
old.Zeikerd
Guest
- Thread starter
- #4
Yeah, I noticed that too.
I don't think they need to change anything about the statcap. But maybe make 300+ points usefull.
Afaik you get 1% damage increase with every 10-15 points in a stat before 250 and every 15-20 points after 250. They could make it so that it's 25-30 after 300 and 30-35 after 350 with max cap of 400 orso.
I don't think they need to change anything about the statcap. But maybe make 300+ points usefull.
Afaik you get 1% damage increase with every 10-15 points in a stat before 250 and every 15-20 points after 250. They could make it so that it's 25-30 after 300 and 30-35 after 350 with max cap of 400 orso.
F
Flimgoblin
Guest
- Thread starter
- #5
and any enhance clerics since speccing over 40 used to be utterly pointless ...
they just need to make buffbots killable in the PKs... oh wait they are volleytime!
they just need to make buffbots killable in the PKs... oh wait they are
volleytime!
Z
Zordo
Guest
- Thread starter
- #6
Still no class fixes.. 
A
Apathy
Guest
- Thread starter
- #7
"Some Bards were able to chain-cast their spells in the Minor Lullaby line, bypassing the 5 second recast timer. This has been fixed."
Woo.
a.
*
Woo.
a.
*
M
Meatballs
Guest
- Thread starter
- #8
Beaded Resisting Stones coming to Alb 
O
old.Niljindil
Guest
- Thread starter
- #9
im just sooo glad i havent decided on a final SC template yet
T
Tigerius
Guest
- Thread starter
- #10
Well neither have I, but honestly am I glad about being given a reason to wait until 1.60 to do so? Hell no :/
P
Pin
Guest
- Thread starter
- #11
Originally posted by **Aligro**
"However, we are keeping part of the capping changes: We've raised the player stat caps so that high level buff spells will not exceed the cap. Players who receive high level buff spells from friendly casters will notice this change the most. This means that races that a high starting stat (such as strength or dexterity) will now be able to buff it a bit more than those races that do not have a high starting stat."
good news for buffbot users
Hmmm.... Comprehension still a problem? Or is it just that the words 'buff spells' are in the sentence so you automatically spout a buffbot whine?
This doesn't mean that there is any change to buffs, this means that the 300 total cap to stats has been raised so that Trolls see benefit from high starting Str, Luris and Saracens from high Dex, etc.
GOOD CHANGE
T
Tranquil-
Guest
- Thread starter
- #12
It's a good thing that race will matter to some extent, but the point is that you won't get over 300 in a stat unbuffed, hence it only applies to buffed people.
P
Pin
Guest
- Thread starter
- #13
Originally posted by Tranquil-
It's a good thing that race will matter to some extent, but the point is that you won't get over 300 in a stat unbuffed, hence it only applies to buffed people.
And? Since when was it a bad thing to be buffed? It never was.
It was a bad thing that buffs were pointless beyond a certain point (300 stat).
Okay, so now the troll zerkers can hit you 10% harder, could count that as a bad thing, but errr...
K
klavrynd
Guest
- Thread starter
- #14
Some Bards were able to chain-cast their spells in the Minor Lullaby line, bypassing the 5 second recast timer. This has been fixed
yay
We have made the quest Ancestral Secrets repeatable.
yay
where's the norse zerker luv?
yay
We have made the quest Ancestral Secrets repeatable.
yay
where's the norse zerker luv?
T
Tranquil-
Guest
- Thread starter
- #15
If I could get my will, all soloers had no buffs whatsoever. You are SOLO, unsupported. Will be pretty much impossible to get right/implemented though since soloers would group, but that's atleast my opinion on the issue.
edit: Pin: It's not bad to be buffed, it's bad that you have to pay EXTRA to be buffed, to have chance.
edit: Pin: It's not bad to be buffed, it's bad that you have to pay EXTRA to be buffed, to have chance.
I
ImLestat
Guest
- Thread starter
- #16
Guess noone noticed perhaps one of the most longed for changes. Single line respec stones dropping in one of the SI dungeons.
P
Pin
Guest
- Thread starter
- #17
Yeah, I actually read the WHOLE thing
Anyways, doesn't effect me much as I don't have any fecked-up chars atm
E
elerand
Guest
- Thread starter
- #18
You want zerker love? Go to a zerker brothel like anyone else
Zerks are a finished class, unless some recent pwnage has left you feeling gimped!
T
Tranquil-
Guest
- Thread starter
- #19
Zerkers are soft and fluffy :wub:
O
old.Trine Aquavit
Guest
- Thread starter
- #20
Not just SI zones. They will also drop in Summoners hall (RvR dungeon).
S
StormriderX
Guest
- Thread starter
- #21
those are realm respec stones
T
The Real Redi
Guest
- Thread starter
- #22
Buffbots are for people who are trying to make up for their lack of l33tness in the RW, by pwning everyone in the game by parking their pussbot in a PK.
I will stop knocking buffbot owners the day that they /stick their mute friend to the main, and take him roaming with you. The fact that i spend time away from the game socialising and generally spending the odd hour attending to my Real life, means i don't have time, and don't want to waste more cash on a second subscription (more money than sense? )
How long since some of you bot users tried it _without_ being buffed? Has spending time with the confidence of not losing your buffs made your skills rusty perhaps? Just wondering...
I will stop knocking buffbot owners the day that they /stick their mute friend to the main, and take him roaming with you. The fact that i spend time away from the game socialising and generally spending the odd hour attending to my Real life, means i don't have time, and don't want to waste more cash on a second subscription (more money than sense?
)How long since some of you bot users tried it _without_ being buffed? Has spending time with the confidence of not losing your buffs made your skills rusty perhaps? Just wondering...
T
Tranquil-
Guest
- Thread starter
- #23
And here's someone who obviously has been ganked alot more than me.
edit: To previous poster: There's no reason to whine at the users.
edit: To previous poster: There's no reason to whine at the users.
T
The Real Redi
Guest
- Thread starter
- #24
heck i been ganked more than EVERYONE! :lol:
It's not the dying that gets to me anymore, i just think it would make for a much better game if there was a range on buffs, to stop people parking Buffbots in PKs where they can't be killed...
There's no way anyone can convince me that thats a big or clever thing to do, and i'd rather be pwned than become reliant on a buffbot. I do really wonder though if relying on a bot decays your talents without though, i really do.
Anyone who uses a bot and has found themselves botless (dunno, one pc won't start for example) do you find your styles and tactics have suffered as a result? I ask because if Mythic DO put a range on buffs (which ain't ever going to happen, as someone said: buffbots = revenue) would it effect many of the current users?
It's not the dying that gets to me anymore, i just think it would make for a much better game if there was a range on buffs, to stop people parking Buffbots in PKs where they can't be killed...
There's no way anyone can convince me that thats a big or clever thing to do, and i'd rather be pwned than become reliant on a buffbot. I do really wonder though if relying on a bot decays your talents without though, i really do.
Anyone who uses a bot and has found themselves botless (dunno, one pc won't start for example) do you find your styles and tactics have suffered as a result? I ask because if Mythic DO put a range on buffs (which ain't ever going to happen, as someone said: buffbots = revenue) would it effect many of the current users?
J
Jergiot
Guest
- Thread starter
- #25
mythic=slow retards