Embattle
FH is my second home
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 13,506
Face - palm
Your request has been fulfilled by Embattle's facepalm facilities.
Face - palm
If we can get CO2 down in the meantime then worth it. And we can recover the minerals and metals from the battery.It will replace EV within 20 years and all this digging out super rare minerals and all the pollution that creates will be an embarrassing side history.
If we can get CO2 down in the meantime then worth it. And we can recover the minerals and metals from the battery.
If we can get CO2 down in the meantime then worth it. And we can recover the minerals and metals from the battery.
You can't repair the rivers and landscape though.
I'm not playing down the effects of mining. But they're generally localised effects - the greater threat is the global one and we must take a wholistic approach.You can't repair the rivers and landscape though.
It's *more* localised than a gas that spreads across the globe Raven.Poisoned rivers dumping shit all over the place is not localised.
Obviously much better, but I wonder what will happen when we just pump water vapour into the atmosphere on an industrial scale.
Cue whinging about the rain
Climate change: July world's hottest month ever recorded - US agency
US scientists say July's land and ocean temperature was 0.93C (1.68F) above the 20th Century average.www.bbc.co.uk
Hydrogen is the natural choice for energy storage from renewable sources. We don't need horrible batteries, with their offensively polluting component sources.
I really don't know where the issue is.
The issue is blue hydrogen is 20% worse for the environment than continuing to burn natural gas.I really don't know where the issue is.