Bury it or blow it into space.
Scouse things
Loading a rocket with radioactive gunk strikes me as a brilliant plan tbh.
Until one accidentally explodes in the atmosphere and irradiates half a continentLoading a rocket with radioactive gunk strikes me as a brilliant plan tbh.
the waste would be in a form that could harmlessly survive total destruction of the rocket at any height.
Bury it or blow it into space.
Anyone henceforth who says something as obviously retarded as "blow it into space" should be shot and their family line wiped out lest the contamination of their personality gets passed to other humans.
Hmm. Wanker of the week award goes to @ScouseAnyone henceforth who says something as obviously retarded as "blow it into space" should be shot and their family line wiped out lest the contamination of their personality gets passed to other humans.
Basically they would just transform it into the most stable form of glass and seal it in an entry proof capsule..even if the capsule is broken it would fall as easily recoverable chunks.
Assuming blowing it into space is off the table, that leaves one option. Which is what they're doing... If you have a better idea (about what to do with radioactive stuff *now*) I'm sure they'd be all ears.You won that with the retarded "blow it into space" line you pulled out of your well-reamed ass.
You asked what options there were for dealing with the shit. Not if they would be used. Sending it into space is an option. And if we had a safe space elevator so we could transport it out or to the moon rather than a rocket then it would be a viable option.You won that with the retarded "blow it into space" line you pulled out of your well-reamed ass.
Yeah that is why we need the safest way possible which is dry cask well out of the way. In 200 years we might need to cask it again or we might have the technology to dispose of it.The thing about deep geological disposal is that it's not working anywhere.
For a start - we can't design a "cask" for disposal that lasts more than 300 years. After that the casks themselves become radioactive waste...
...the fact is that there is NO safe way to store this stuff that humans are aware of. And we're gonna make more of it.
Yeah that is why we need the safest way possible.
I agree with that. The only place we disagree is thinking that it is not a necessary risk. Depending on countries like Russia for Oil and Gas is not a good long term plan. 10 years ago we should have started building a new generation of power plants as they are the only way we can be self sufficient for the next 30-50 years while hopefully a viable green renewable energy source can be found.I agree. But the problem is that the safest way possible we have is still unsafe.
hopefully a viable green renewable energy source can be found.
But isn't that the same as saying if we had only invested £10 Trillion we could have cured cancer. I thought that he was saying that if we had spent that money on developing Green Energy we could have a viable solution. But that is just a guess that throwing money at it would have solved the problem he is not aware of an answer?Viable green renewable energy sources are already available according to the head of the UN's environment committee. According to him if we'd have spent 1/3rd of what we spent "saving" therich peoplebanks we could have fixed global warming and secured global energy supplies. He almost quit, apparently.
But isn't that the same as saying if we had only invested £10 Trillion we could have cured cancer.
The problem with that is until there is just one global nation you can not really have an energy policy that is dependent on another nation. Any land locked nation would need to have all of their energy come though another country and probably have to pay for the privilege.Iceland reckon they can provide the whole of Europe with Geo-thermal electricity, given the investment.
investment.
Crazy fools.