WTC incident 'fake'?

Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Mr.Monkey

Guest
Back in my day conspiracy theories were believeable.


Now it just seems that the prize goes to the person with the most far fetched one....


Also I refuse to even contemplate anything that this man says
http://www.davidicke.com/

After saving too few goals, he thought he could be jesus and save some souls...
 
U

Uncle Sick(tm)

Guest
So how come nobody involved in this so-called conspiracy hasn't leaked anything to the media yet?

A conspiracy of this magnitude will have a lot of people involved... and the more people involved the higher the risk of someone starting to talk. Make sense somehow, doesn't it?

Someone always talks - that's human nature.
 
M

~Mobius~

Guest
I really enjoy conspiracy theories but this sounds a little to far-fetched. :) Interesting though I hope they make a programme from it or something.
 
M

MYstIC G

Guest
Originally posted by tris-
i said STAGED!
Click to expand...
this thread is staged tbh, THIS IS ALL A CONSPIRACY, YOU'RE ALL JUST TRYING TO DRIVE ME MAD WITH UTTER DRIVEL.









(tbh)









Oh & a newbie by any other name, still posts a rake of shite.
 
W

Will

Guest
There are plenty of sites out there on the interweb which tear apart these theories. I remember a discussion about this (last year?) already on these boards, and everything was quite throughly debunked.
 
S

sad_mung

Guest
Originally posted by tris-

how do you also explain a steel structure just turning into dust for no reason and then floating back to the ground? it just happend for no reason?
Click to expand...
With a little bit of thought this is easily explained.
Dust from the first buildings collapse was everywhere, it coated the other tower. When the other tower collapsed, the spire sank rapidly, but because the dust is lighter, it remained suspended (in the shape of the spire it coated) momentarily before dissipating thus creating the illusion of the spire turning to dust.

EDIT: And If I can disprove that part of this crackpot theory, then I'm sure the rest of it is just as easily disproved.
 
W

Wij

Guest
This has got to be the dumbest thread ever. Let's talk about shit or something less moronic.
 
L

leggy

Guest
I dont think the point is that it was faked. I've read about this before and it was only in relation to the pentagon. The theory goes that it wasn't a plane that destroyed part of the pentagon but an explosives laden truck or some other pish.

Either way. 300 or so people died in the pentagon that day iirc. Try showing this shite to one of their family and see if you don't get a good thrashing.
 
C

Clowneh!

Guest
Sooooo.... Xtro pissed in his girlfriends mouth?
 
D

Deadmanwalking

Guest
I am jesus... the bible is all holograms :eek:
 
W

WPKenny

Guest
The funniest thing about this thread is the people posting blatently piss-take replies and others taking them seriously.

Hilarious :)
 
D

Deadmanwalking

Guest
You implying im not jesus, and i was taking the piss?

Pfft
 
D

dysfunction

Guest
Yes it was all a fake.

Those two buildings in New York never existed in the first place and all those thousands of people that died didnt exist either.

Oh an our insurance company which paid out 10's of millions of pounds didnt actually pay that.
 
M

Mr^B

Guest
God, this is all so 18 months ago.

:(

Who cares - you'll never really know "the truth" because "the truth" (objective reality) doesn't exist.
 
S

silverthorn

Guest
For all those conspiracy theorists...

This is a great place to start www.rense.com

There's a lot of eye opening stuff here.
 
T

The Kingpin

Guest
Christ..

From this thread general getting as bad as DAoC forums..

Not the thread topic, but the replys...

Even if it is far-fetched, still no reason to act like a utter ass..

and fill it with random spam..

The arguments against it were rather good reading, bah, it all wrnt rong after page 2..
 
D

Deadmanwalking

Guest
I think you will find it went wrong after peoples replys were just either ignored or gievn the old "But how can you be sure" line.

So i for one just gave up.
 
D

Damini

Guest
The arguments against it aren't good reading, they aren't even written in good english let alone contain any coherant or plausible interpretation of events. As such, they deserve derision.

There are good conspiracy theory sites out there that do make you pause for thought. None of these were bought up in the opening of the thread though.
 
J

Jonaldo

Guest
Do I exist or am I just an AI responding to certain keywords in your posts?
 
D

dysfunction

Guest
Originally posted by The Kingpin
Christ..

From this thread general getting as bad as DAoC forums..

Not the thread topic, but the replys...

Even if it is far-fetched, still no reason to act like a utter ass..

and fill it with random spam..

The arguments against it were rather good reading, bah, it all wrnt rong after page 2..
Click to expand...



Perhaps the topic about conspiracy theories is not bad but having one about fake planes crashing into the wtc is utter crap.

If anyone believe planes DIDNT crashed into the WTC are complete and utter morons.

The only one you could have a theory about is possibly the Pentagon as that could have been a missile or something else....as there is no video footage.

You cant create fake video footage of a plane crashing into a building in New York within such a short space of time of the reporting of this event. Also all the eye witnesses who had bits of bulding falling all around the place.
 
T

tris-

Guest
Originally posted by sad_mung
With a little bit of thought this is easily explained.
Dust from the first buildings collapse was everywhere, it coated the other tower. When the other tower collapsed, the spire sank rapidly, but because the dust is lighter, it remained suspended (in the shape of the spire it coated) momentarily before dissipating thus creating the illusion of the spire turning to dust.

EDIT: And If I can disprove that part of this crackpot theory, then I'm sure the rest of it is just as easily disproved.
Click to expand...

suppose that makes sense ;)

Originally posted by dysfunction
Yes it was all a fake.

Those two buildings in New York never existed in the first place and all those thousands of people that died didnt exist either.
Click to expand...

well done for reading the thread :rolleyes:
 
M

Mr^B

Guest
Perhaps you should have called the thread:

"Pentagon incident 'fake'?"

Rather than

"WTC incident 'fake'?"

As the title kind of hints that the WTC incident was a fake.
 
T

tris-

Guest
may aswell close this now, as random people are still gonna reply without reading any posts and there isnt much more to say - there is the people who will believe what the news is said and nothing else and will call anyone else who doesnt believe it a moron or some other stupid name and there is the people who will question it but only to a certain degree. sheesh, thought people could stop being a twat for at least one thread but shit happens eh.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top Bottom