SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,374
You may scoff, but when I left the house it was 14 degrees outside, now it's a positively balmy 16 degrees.

You're welcome.
 

Overdriven

Dumpster Fire of The South
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
12,821

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
45,047
If you can make giving up smoking easier and therefore have more chance of success then anything is good, talking as an ex smoking addict.
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,374
I know we have harm reduction but I disagree that our tax should go to subsidise the tobacco industry.


Smokers should have to pay for their own e-fags.

If they are offered NRT or other treatments on the NHS, then why shouldn't they be offered something which is likely to be cheaper and more effective?
 

Access Denied

It was like that when I got here...
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
2,552
If you can make giving up smoking easier and therefore have more chance of success then anything is good, talking as an ex smoking addict.

I disagree. Gum/patches/inhalators etc are designed to wean you off cigarettes completely and are available free of charge on the NHS. Replacing cigarettes with vapes/e-cigs is just swapping out crutches and if that's the case then the smoker should be paying for that themselves. And I'm speaking as a current smoker.
 

Aoami

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
11,223
I disagree. Gum/patches/inhalators etc are designed to wean you off cigarettes completely and are available free of charge on the NHS. Replacing cigarettes with vapes/e-cigs is just swapping out crutches and if that's the case then the smoker should be paying for that themselves. And I'm speaking as a current smoker.
I agree. I vaped for 3-4 years to try and stop smoking. It was only going onto the gum that actually got me off it, the vaping just replaced it. It probably is healthier than smoking, but the long term risks are a complete unknown.
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,374
I disagree. Gum/patches/inhalators etc are designed to wean you off cigarettes completely and are available free of charge on the NHS. Replacing cigarettes with vapes/e-cigs is just swapping out crutches and if that's the case then the smoker should be paying for that themselves. And I'm speaking as a current smoker.

Luckily those with full access to the latest research around quitting disagree


Normal way to quit I've seen through vaping is to move across, then gradually reduce the nicotine levels of the "juice" until you reach zero, then wean yourself off that. Would be incredibly easy to design a treatment regimen around that concept tbh.

Unless you listen to the particularly unhinged part of the tobacco control lobby vaping is far safer than smoking, so even if people just switch over, it's a massive net benefit for Public Health.
 

Aoami

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
11,223
Clearly better for you, but I found it so much more addictive than smoking, probably egged on by the fact I could do it indoors, lack of smell on clothes and hands etc. Clearly better for you than smoking but still not really ideal pumping that much nicotine into yourself probably.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,163
Does "stopping smoking" = "continuing vaping"?

i.e. if you're off the fags, but vape like a motherfucker, have you "stopped smoking"?
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,007
Does "stopping smoking" = "continuing vaping"?

i.e. if you're off the fags, but vape like a motherfucker, have you "stopped smoking"?

Yes.

Another subject that people without a clue are now experts it appears.
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
45,047
Yep. Vaping isn't a quitting aid. It's addiction-subsidy.

Scouse in talking about something he has no idea about shocker.

Firstly, vaping is easily controlled, dose wise. Vaping fluids can be steadily dropped in nicotine content and vaporisers adjusted in power. It gets people off tobacco, nicotine, while itself a toxin, is not actually that harmful compared to all the nasty shit in tobacco.

Smoking isn't just about giving up the physical addiction to nicotine it is also about giving up the act of smoking. Nothing worked for me except Champix in the end, which can seriously fuck people up and even then, the hardest part was changing routine...Im not even sure if Champix is a thing anymore. Gum and lozenges leave a lot of people feeling sick and the patches leave horrendous rashes.

And lastly, they already provide sort-of-vapes and they taste like shit.
 

Aoami

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
11,223
Does "stopping smoking" = "continuing vaping"?

i.e. if you're off the fags, but vape like a motherfucker, have you "stopped smoking"?

In my opinion, no. Never met a vaper who wasn't having the odd fag as well.
 

Aoami

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
11,223
Smoking isn't just about giving up the physical addiction to nicotine it is also about giving up the act of smoking. Nothing worked for me except Champix in the end, which can seriously fuck people up and even then, the hardest part was changing routine...Im not even sure if Champix is a thing anymore. Gum and lozenges leave a lot of people feeling sick and the patches leave horrendous rashes.

My mate has started using tabex, something from Bulgaria similar to Champix. 2 days of using it and he hasn't slept yet so god knows what's in it!
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,374
Does "stopping smoking" = "continuing vaping"?

i.e. if you're off the fags, but vape like a motherfucker, have you "stopped smoking"?

Yes. Remember the old saying there's no smoke without fire? Well considering there is no fire involved with vaping - unless you get a properly cheap vape - I think we can fairly assume there is no smoke involved. No smoke means it isn't smoking.

HTH
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,163
In my opinion, no. Never met a vaper who wasn't having the odd fag as well.
Yep - but the question is about the classification.

Do the government class "vapers" as having stopped smoking?
 

Aoami

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
11,223
Yep - but the question is about the classification.

Do the government class "vapers" as having stopped smoking?

No idea what the official classification is. I still consider myself a smoker even though I have a smoke once in a blue moon on a night out these days.
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,374
My mate has started using tabex, something from Bulgaria similar to Champix. 2 days of using it and he hasn't slept yet so god knows what's in it!

Champix has recently been withdrawn due to compounds in it which can - massive irony alert - cause cancer.

 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,163
Yes. Remember the old saying there's no smoke without fire? Well considering there is no fire involved with vaping - unless you get a properly cheap vape - I think we can fairly assume there is no smoke involved. No smoke means it isn't smoking.

HTH


Obviously, if you're not smoking fags you're stopping smoking. But if you're still vaping - does the NHS continue to subsidise?

What if you've started smoking again? Can you go back to your doctor and get vapes?

If this is the case it's massively obviously open to abuse and it means taxpayers will be picking up the bill for people to vape.
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,374
Obviously, if you're not smoking fags you're stopping smoking. But if you're still vaping - does the NHS continue to subsidise?

What if you've started smoking again? Can you go back to your doctor and get vapes?

If this is the case it's massively obviously open to abuse and it means taxpayers will be picking up the bill for people to vape.

To me that all depends. If someone wants to carry on with nicotine I wouldn't be in favour of the NHS subsidising it. But if they want to quit completely, then I would as it looks to be the most effective tool to make that happen.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,163
To me that all depends. If someone wants to carry on with nicotine I wouldn't be in favour of the NHS subsidising it. But if they want to quit completely, then I would as it looks to be the most effective tool to make that happen.
Open to abuse tbh.

If they try and fail on vaping, do we let them try and fail forever? In the meantime, they get free vapes?

That would be *massively* abused.
 

MYstIC G

Official Licensed Lump of Coal™ Distributor
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
12,492
Luckily those with full access to the latest research around quitting disagree


Normal way to quit I've seen through vaping is to move across, then gradually reduce the nicotine levels of the "juice" until you reach zero, then wean yourself off that. Would be incredibly easy to design a treatment regimen around that concept tbh.

Unless you listen to the particularly unhinged part of the tobacco control lobby vaping is far safer than smoking, so even if people just switch over, it's a massive net benefit for Public Health.
Whatever happened to just letting them all chew on Bic Biro's?
 

Aoami

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
11,223
In all seriousness, the gum worked wonders for me. Satisfied the nicotine cravings and broke the habit of smoking, which is what vaping just couldn't do. As I said, I still have the odd cig on a BNO, but that's once every couple of months and I'm not too bothered about it really, no cravings or anything as a result.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom