- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 37,047
Was being lighthearted.But yeah, everyone under *the age of Scouse* is a cunt
Was being lighthearted.But yeah, everyone under *the age of Scouse* is a cunt
![]()
Dogger Bank is about more than shipping forecasts: it shows how we can rewild our seas | Charles Clover
As of today, trawling is banned in the British part of the famous sunken landmass – a major win for biodiversity, says Charles Clover of the Blue Marine Foundationwww.theguardian.com
The danger is - the Tories have tried to backtrack on their legal responsibilities. We've a metric fuckton of paper preserves where we allow trawling - and the Tories are trying to not implement the law now that they can.
We don't need an "experiment" - we need to stop raping the natural world.
Actually, it was EU legislation that confused matters, that are still confusing matters for member states now. Norway do not have that excuse, neither do we, now.
So yes. The barrier of the fisheries policy has been removed. And it's exposed the Tories to the fact that they don't really want it removed, that they don't want to protect the environment.When the common fisheries policy ended in UK waters after Brexit, ministers from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs were – our charity had to remind them – obliged to enforce the nature laws we had inherited from Europe. There was no longer any conflict in law.
George Eustice, the environment secretary, has boasted that in protecting Dogger Bank, Britain was using its post-Brexit freedoms to protect the marine environment. But he then did something horrendous earlier this year, proposing in a green paper to remove all duties on ministers to protect nature sites, marine or terrestrial
Moralising from the army?
![]()
Paratroopers banned from Nato deployment after Essex orgy – report
Colchester barracks incident came after other cases and could be seen to denigrate women, says head of armywww.theguardian.com
If it's consentual how can it "denigrate women"? Nobody is complaining that the 8 men involved or the many other onlookers are "denigrating men".
I think as a society a lot of us have to face facts - some women's idea of a good time is to stuff as many cocks in them as they can get. And some blokes idea of a good time is to provide those cocks / watch.
Not my bag baby. But whatever floats people's boats if everybody's happy surely?
How many freddies love the cock as much as this lady? We all know @Jupitus loves being chucked about like a little fuckdoll and @Deebs likes to literally stick his nose in.
@Embattle's voting proclivities show he's not averse to being bent over from a political standpoint but does that mean he's happy to take a length from @Wij?
What about the girls? Do @russell or @Yoni like to wash their hair in jizz?
![]()
Moralising from the army?
![]()
Paratroopers banned from Nato deployment after Essex orgy – report
Colchester barracks incident came after other cases and could be seen to denigrate women, says head of armywww.theguardian.com
If it's consentual how can it "denigrate women"? Nobody is complaining that the 8 men involved or the many other onlookers are "denigrating men".
I think as a society a lot of us have to face facts - some women's idea of a good time is to stuff as many cocks in them as they can get. And some blokes idea of a good time is to provide those cocks / watch.
Not my bag baby. But whatever floats people's boats if everybody's happy surely?
How many freddies love the cock as much as this lady? We all know @Jupitus loves being chucked about like a little fuckdoll and @Deebs likes to literally stick his nose in.
@Embattle's voting proclivities show he's not averse to being bent over from a political standpoint but does that mean he's happy to take a length from @Wij?
What about the girls? Do @russell or @Yoni like to wash their hair in jizz?
![]()
100%.New puritanism innit? "Denigrating women" in this context denies women agency.
The Army said:What soldiers do in their private lives is their own affair. The only criterion is that it must not harm operational effectiveness
Having gay squaddies used to be so embarrasing for the army that it was a court martial offence.Because it's embarrassing for the army?
Having gay squaddies used to be so embarrasing for the army that it was a court martial offence.
Why should the army have any say in the morality of wider society?
ban all consentual sexual activity from barracks.
Read the linky dude![]()