xBox to have 3.2GHz 3-core CPU

TdC

Trem's hunky sex love muffin
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
30,925
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/25/ibm_xbox_ms/

xBox is going to have a serious engine. only thing I question is the 1 meg cache being shared by three cores. Sun's going something similar with a quad core cpu sharing a big cache, but I'm not really into sharing things. not when it comes to cpus :/
 

Dommers

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
575
Have you actually seen the powersupply for it? I know its going to be tucked away behind a TV, buts its bloody big.
 

FuzzyLogic

Kicking squealing Gucci little piggy
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
1,437
Not surprising really, the first generation of games have rarely been as advanced(?) as the later games for most consoles, only one I can think of offhand that does make better use of the hardware straight off the bat is probably Mario 64.
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,370
Woah....that's like so cool man!!


Shame it won't have Gran Turismo or Wipeout. It mighta got my money if it did.
 

Panda On Smack

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
1,030
Heh, you just cant help yourself :)

I really dont know why you still drop your Sony fanboy comments in but i actually look forward to what you have to say now. A non Sony thread wouldnt be the same without you telling us how rubbish the product is going to be compared to Sony's version ;)
 

KevinUK

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
649
I read that the huge external power supply is just in the dev kits and the commercial one will be smaller.
 

PLightstar

Resident Freddy
Joined
Dec 29, 2003
Messages
2,103
In someway it wouldn't be a console thread without Bodhi's sony fanboy input, he must be on their payroll.
 

Aada

Part of the furniture
Joined
Mar 12, 2004
Messages
6,716
Bodhi said:
Woah....that's like so cool man!!


Shame it won't have Gran Turismo or Wipeout. It mighta got my money if it did.

Shame the PS3 won't have Halo3 100x better then anything on the PS2 and PS3

I remember when Killzone was hyped to be the Halo killer.. didn't it get less average reviews? lol
 

Whipped

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,155
KevinUK said:
I read that the huge external power supply is just in the dev kits and the commercial one will be smaller.

They'll probably still catch fire though ;)
 

nath

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
8,009
Aada said:
Shame the PS3 won't have Halo3 100x better then anything on the PS2 and PS3

I've got an xbox, not a PS2 so don't take me for a sony fanboy when I say this:

Halo and Halo 2 are utter dross. Halo 3 probably will be too.
 

FuzzyLogic

Kicking squealing Gucci little piggy
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
1,437
Halo always struck as being ok for consoles, fairly bland and a bit poo in the overall scheme of fps games.

N64 Goldeneye is and will remain the best fps console shooter for me :)
 

Aada

Part of the furniture
Joined
Mar 12, 2004
Messages
6,716
FuzzyLogic said:
Halo always struck as being ok for consoles, fairly bland and a bit poo in the overall scheme of fps games.

N64 Goldeneye is and will remain the best fps console shooter for me :)


Yeah you can't beat Goldeneye mate man i still have some fond memories of that game... that game was and is the shit.

Shame Rare not done much since.. lets hope Perfect Dark Zero is any good.. i loved the first one.

Im a little bored of FPS now except BF2 lol :) don't think il bother with Q4 looks like D3.
 

Ch3tan

I aer teh win!!
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
27,318
Why did you go there? Halo is shite, and the 3rd one will be too. Best console fps my arse, as fuzzy said, Goldeneye all the way, and perfect dark.
 

Aada

Part of the furniture
Joined
Mar 12, 2004
Messages
6,716
Ch3tan said:
Why did you go there? Halo is shite, and the 3rd one will be too. Best console fps my arse, as fuzzy said, Goldeneye all the way, and perfect dark.

Guess me and the other millions of people who love it disagree :(
 

Ch3tan

I aer teh win!!
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
27,318
Yes you are all clearly wrong.

It is overhyped beyond all belief though. Please dont use it too argue against Bodhi, because I think more people would rather play wipeout or turismo than another halo. I certainly would.
 

Aada

Part of the furniture
Joined
Mar 12, 2004
Messages
6,716
I could play GT3 and still get a pretty much same experiance? please don't tell me GT4 is a better experiance.. ive played both to the death and there isn't that lot of difference.

Wipeout? nah the game is too short and frankly gets pretty boring after you have ran the same course 20x time over ;/

I'm not gonna get into a argument over which game is better etc because at the end of the day its all down to opinion but for me Halo comes #2 behind goldeneye.

Halo2 was the fastest selling console game when it came out that speaks for itself but again its all down to opinion :)
 

MYstIC G

Official Licensed Lump of Coal™ Distributor
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
12,481
Fastest seller, probably fastest return too :p
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,370
Aada said:
Shame the PS3 won't have Halo3 100x better then anything on the PS2 and PS3

I remember when Killzone was hyped to be the Halo killer.. didn't it get less average reviews? lol

Main problem I see with what you're saying is that Halo sucked arse.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom