Which one?

I <name> do swear that I am a fanboy for...

  • Microsoft

    Votes: 155 45.1%
  • Nintendo

    Votes: 131 38.1%
  • Sony

    Votes: 118 34.3%

  • Total voters
    344
O

old.Munkie

Guest
Bugger. We can only vote once.



Was gonna spam the polls.:clap:
 
M

Moving Target

Guest
ooh! PS2 and Gamecube both on 3....go PS2 go!!
 
N

Nibbler

Guest
Well I think it's agreed that the X-Box sucks :D
 
S

Sir Frizz

Guest
ps2 all the way baby, it has the potential to destroy everything in its path once its truly great games are realeased:)

ph34r FFX and MGS2:clap:
 
B

bodhi

Guest
PlayStation 2 has won the war already. Nice try Ninty and MS tho. Better luck next time tho!
 
W

Wazzerphuk

Guest
Originally posted by Bodhi
PlayStation 2 has won the war already. Nice try Ninty and MS tho. Better luck next time tho!

You played on either machine?
 
O

old.Munkie

Guest
Originally posted by Bodhi
PlayStation 2 has won the war already. Nice try Ninty and MS tho. Better luck next time tho!



It also depends on what you mean by War.


If you mean sales then PS2 obviously has a good start. But I think that in a few months time people will see that it really is underpowered compared to the GC and XB.

I tend to think that the quality of games and shelf life of the console so that it continues to be supported software wise are more important than sales figures.

The Dreamcast is a quality console. It just never got the shelf life thing sorted really.

I see GAMECUBE as the only machine capable of producing cutting edge games consistantly and having the lastability.


As with all arguments of this nature - time will tell.
 
S

Sir Frizz

Guest
you say the PS2 is underpowered, yet when the psx and n64 battle was underway, which side won? evidently the psx had atleast twice as many sales as the 64 and lasted longer even tho it came out before, power is nothing without control, as some people would say

:clap:
 
O

old.Munkie

Guest
The main reason the N64 went under is the use of Rom carts. These proved expensive to make and could not be discounted much.


GC uses small CD type things.




I have nothing against the PS2. It's just that given the choice out of the 3 on offer I think the GC will be the best overall. If you have already purchased a PS2 then good on you and may you have many good times on it.
 
B

bodhi

Guest
Originally posted by Munkie




It also depends on what you mean by War.


If you mean sales then PS2 obviously has a good start. But I think that in a few months time people will see that it really is underpowered compared to the GC and XB.

I tend to think that the quality of games and shelf life of the console so that it continues to be supported software wise are more important than sales figures.

The Dreamcast is a quality console. It just never got the shelf life thing sorted really.

I see GAMECUBE as the only machine capable of producing cutting edge games consistantly and having the lastability.


As with all arguments of this nature - time will tell.

Underpowered on paper yes. But how DID they get GT3 looking better than every Xbox game so far?

Quality of games and shelf life? Strike two to Sony. PS2 will outlast the other two. Fact.

Remember, Sony has already sold over 30 million PS2's. And as PS2 prices come down, sales go up. Ninty and MS dont have a snowball's chance in hell of beating Sony.

/me goes back to worshipping his Sony poster.
 
W

Wazzerphuk

Guest
Originally posted by Bodhi


Underpowered on paper yes. But how DID they get GT3 looking better than every Xbox game so far?

Because it spent much longer time in development because the PS2 is quite old now. The X-Box is still a sparkly n00b.
 
W

Wij

Guest
Yeh. Project Gotham Racing looks better than GT3 in some ways and worse in others but Polyphony are a great developer who had a lot of time to make GT3. Bizarre Creations had to meet the deadline of the Xbox launch. If you look at Metropolis Street Racer on the DC it looks great but they had less pressure to release that. Um, conclusion, the Xbox is still on 1st generation titles and can look as good as 2nd gen PS2 games. It's probably a little more powerful. Not enough to make a real difference but worth noting.
 
J

jreal

Guest
You also must remember that the sony marketing campaign was also a very decisive factor in getting pp aboard and Mircosoft have more money in one of there trouser pockets than sony have put together thus heavy marketing with the WWF for example and all kinds of other promotions will probably ensure a healthy user base for the xbox anyway.
 
B

bodhi

Guest
Don't underestimate Sony's marketing power. They can probably do better than Microsoft with a tenth of the money. Remembering that Sony is by far a stronger brand name than Microsoft (name one thing Sony don't do well), I'd be far more scared of Sony than MS if I was Nintendo.
 
W

Wij

Guest
Originally posted by Bodhi
Xbox still sucks dick tho :)

So does Jenna Jameson. There's a point there somewhere :)

It's true tho. Sony is a MUCH more trusted brand than M$.
 
M

MYstIC G

Guest
Originally posted by Bodhi
Don't underestimate Sony's marketing power. They can probably do better than Microsoft with a tenth of the money.
And with this "3rd place" rubbish there definatly not trying but it'll still be better than any crap m$ uses, just look @ the XP ads for example.
 
O

old.mid_gen

Guest
*ahem*

GT3 look better than Halo?

I think not.

Personally I'm buying an XBox (import no less), but then I'm not a mindless Microsoft basher, I know a good console then I see one. Jet Set Future, DOA3, SC2, all gonna 0wn :)

Not saying the PS2 and GC are inferior (although it is true that technically speaking, they are, the PS2 certainly is), I would be very surprised is XBox gains any kind of real market share in the UK until Xmas next year. I suspect XBox will get a warmer reception in the US.

XBox is going to suffer here from the mindless MS-bashers who still think that saying 'M$' is clever. Shame, cos it is a good console, with some excellent games on the way.

Xmas next year will be the killer, GC, XBox, and PS2 will all be on the european market and all have had their first price drop (at least). Best wait til then before anyone can say anything really :)
 
W

Wazzerphuk

Guest
DoA3. Evidently someone's not been reading about the shedload of bugs that come with it, and the fact it's pretty much DoA2 with a lick of paint.
 
S

Sir Frizz

Guest
Tekken allways has and allways will be the daddy of beat 'em ups, so is GT the daddy of driving games, oh and Final Fantasy is the daddy of rpg's, this is becoming very one sided "folk's", and that left out MGS2, which is the daddy in general. The quality of TOP games is on sony's side, they have already won atleast half the war:)
 
W

Wij

Guest
Fighting game pe0ns. VF2 0wnz all other 3D beat-em-ups. Tekken 4 reports from experienced players are unenthusiastic. KoF 97 0wnz all.

Tekken is a fun game. It's not particularly balanced or technical.
 
N

Nibbler

Guest
OMG Virtua Fighter 2 was so class.


I ruled as Jeffrey. POWERBOMB! PILEDRIVER!

Sweet memories :)
 
S

Sir Frizz

Guest
Originally posted by Wij
Much better than any Tekken nonsense.

no. :eek:



PS: Kazuya was and is the best fighting character imo:) bar none
 
W

Wij

Guest
oh come on. crouch dash, WGF, juggle, okizeme, win.

not exactly rocket science is it ? :)
 
S

Sir Frizz

Guest
even street fighter characters are better than those bums:)
no, even mortal kombat characters:)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom