WTF? Their back.

[Keitanz]

The Sun | The Best for News, Sport, Showbiz, Celebrities | The Sun| The Sun

:lol:

http://twitter.com/#!/LulzSec

 

[Wazzerphuk]

They're back.

 

[Keitanz]

Pfft

 

[Billargh]

Whose back?

 

[Corran]

lulsec attacking sun website etc. guess they felt brave enough to pop up again. Though also sounds like they being dicks and sharing out peoples personal information they obtaining. Good thing that not signed up there as noone worth speaking too.

 

[megadave]

hacking the emails of brooks and co is rather funny though

 

[Himse]

They're*

 

[Sparx]

I think Deebs should put into the C&C that grammar and spelling corrections from other people for the sake of it like the one above should result in an infraction

Ive always hated people who, in an argument, will reply with a grammar correction cause they cant think of a decent retort

 

[Himse]

I think Deebs should put into the C&C that grammar and spelling corrections from other people for the sake of it like the one above should result in an infraction

Ive always hated people who, in an argument, will reply with a grammar correction cause they cant think of a decent retort

It's not really an arguement.

He just claimed to be better educated than myself, yet still cannot get the difference between There, Their and They're.

 

[Wazzerphuk]

I think people who can't communicate via the written word on a written word communication device should also be written into the CoC as punishable.

 

[Zarjazz]

Ive always hated people who, in an argument, will reply with a grammar correction cause they cant think of a decent retort

-1 for Ive and not I've.
-1 for spurious commas.
-1 for cant and not can't.
-1 for missing full stops.

or is that the joke?

 

[Sparx]

It's not really an arguement.

He just claimed to be better educated than myself, yet still cannot get the difference between There, Their and They're.

My new paragraph was explaining something else and not aimed at you. Its something that bugs me especially during a heated argument

 

[Himse]

-1 for Ive and not I've.
-1 for spurious commas.
-1 for cant and not can't.
-1 for missing full stops.

or is that the joke?

 

[Sparx]

-1 for Ive and not I've.
-1 for spurious commas.
-1 for cant and not can't.
-1 for missing full stops.

or is that the joke?

Thats more lazy typing than anything else. Commas are also correct as they can be used instead of brackets

 

[Himse]

My new paragraph was explaining something else and not aimed at you. Its something that bugs me especially during a heated argument

Ah fair enough. My bad.

Have some rep, love and kisses xx

 

[Wazzerphuk]

What bugs me more is having to re-read people's posts because they can't be bothered to communicate their ideas properly.

 

[Sparx]

Have to remember wazz that a lot of people on this forum arent native English speakers so may have a bit more trouble explaining things

 

[Wazzerphuk]

Yeah, true - you seem to be Scottish so you will struggle.

 

[Sparx]

i surprise myself sometimes

 

[Keitanz]

I knew that this would happen.

People make mistakes, Wazzer as someone who works at SI you should know that better than any of us.

 

[Calaen]

i knew that this would happen.

People make mistakes, wazzer as someone who works at si you should know that better than any of us.

haha

 

[GReaper]

I think Deebs should put into the C&C that grammar and spelling corrections from other people for the sake of it like the one above should result in an infraction

Perhaps we could have infractions given to people for poor grammar usage instead?

We should probably use the points suggested by Zarjazz as a guide.

 

[cHodAX]

I knew that this would happen.

People make mistakes, Wazzer as someone who works at SI you should know that better than any of us.

Finest thing you ever typed.

 

[Himse]

I knew that this would happen.

People make mistakes, Wazzer as someone who works at SI you should know that better than any of us.

You shouldn't make mistakes. But for that, have some rep.

 

[Sparx]

Perhaps we could have infractions given to people for poor grammar usage instead?

We should probably use the points suggested by Zarjazz as a guide.

You could but he's wrong.

Screw it just give infractions to anyone who logs into FH.

 

[Marc]

They're

 

[Lamp]

Owner fined for zap collar on pet collie | The Sun |News

poor mutt

 

[megadave]

Spelling and grammatical errors are forgiveable in a normal post but in a thread title it's rather annoying

 

[Wazzerphuk]

I knew that this would happen.

People make mistakes, Wazzer as someone who works at SI you should know that better than any of us.

People do. Elite people don't.