Suggesting a 6.3 farm (opinions plz)

Owl

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Oct 19, 2004
Messages
200
Hello folks!

It's time for me to try to do something in order to aquire that sutekh helm if so been wanting and never seen (neither on CM's, nor did i get any reply from posting in trading forum):)

I want to organize a 6.3 farm in order to finally obtain the sutekh cloth helm. This item: http://camelot.allakhazam.com/item.html?citem=16023.

I'd like to hear your opinions on number needed for something like this/classes prefered. Also please post the reset timer of the encounter if you know it, and if the mobs are magic immune (which would make icewiz(see below) useless)

I was thinking of it being a 2fg raid with a setup like this:

Group 1

ml9 cabby
ml9 cabby/sorc
ml9 sorc/cabby
rejuv cleric
rejuv cleric
Paladin (or blocker)
blocker
icewiz

Group 2

ml9 cabby
ml9 cabby/sorc
minstrel (me)
rejuv cleric
rejuc cleric
Paladin
Tank
Tank

and out of group BB's.

Please post if my setup is a bit exaggerating meaning that the encounter can be done with 1fg only, and also give a method if you have farmed him before.

I only have the minstrel with sally to offer tho i know its not the most recomended class for this.

I was thinking of doing the encounter 5 times in total. I will not roll for any of the loot they drop, but i will preclaim 1 sutekh cloth helm if it drops.

You can find a list of items that drop off sutekh here: http://camelot.allakhazam.com/db/search.html?cmob=7805


Regards.:)
 

psyco

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
3,310
nice idea but i dont think you'll find enough people to help for the cause.... so i would suggest leading a ml6 raid, and preclaim the item you need
 

Bugz

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
7,297
I'd rework a different item into the template in all honesty.

As for farming 6.3, I'm guessing a set group could probably farm them but since your working with random signups, 2 fg's would seem acceptable. Seriously though, the pain is defiently not worth the helm.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom