Statistics may 22 - 2006

[Shike]

Looks to me as if Mids aint underpopulated at all.. like some mids whine about. Some will probably say that, well I play 23 chars, ofc it looks like mid arent underpopulated, can just say, mids aint special in any way, all realms have players with alts, can safely assume the % of ppl with several active alts is pretty much the same in all realms.

 

[xxManiacxx]

2600ish versus 2500ish looks kinda even to me and compared to alb both are underpop which the bonuses shows aswell.

And I took a look couple of weeks ago and then hibs hade 100ish more ppl then mid so it changes around.

Save the screenies and do same thing next month and the month after etc etc then u can start seeing how it is.

 

[Shike]

2600ish versus 2500ish looks kinda even to me and compared to alb both are underpop which the bonuses shows aswell.

And I took a look couple of weeks ago and then hibs hade 100ish more ppl then mid so it changes around.

Save the screenies and do same thing next month and the month after etc etc then u can start seeing how it is.

yip, my plan is to update now and then so we can see trends over time. And albs have always been dominating overall, thats just something we cant do anything about, in all fairness both mid and hib should maybe recieve some sorta bonus the way things look.

 

[Dilanta]

You can't compare active chars - the comparishion for underpopulated is done on active members/accounts.

 

[Andrilyn]

Tbh the realms population has never been divided as "equal" as it has now.
Sure there's always a realm with more people and a realm with less people but overall it's quite the same now.

 

[xxManiacxx]

You can't compare active chars - the comparishion for underpopulated is done on active members/accounts.

Guess u are missing ns forum aswell?

 

[xxManiacxx]

Tbh the realms population has never been divided as "equal" as it has now.
Sure there's always a realm with more people and a realm with less people but overall it's quite the same now.

Well alb having 400 more characters then mid/hib is quite alot

 

[charmangle]

Hmm...

Have Mids been whining about underpoplation ?

I have missed that, myself feel that mids and hibs are fairly even nowdays. But if some Mids feel low on people it might be that before mids had quite a steady lead over Hibs. Myself I believe that since cluster we have had a small driploss of Mids to Hib (more than to Alb) for "tryout" playing. And thats one of the reasons Mids and Hibs have evened out. But thats just my gut feeling.

Anyway In my opinion Mids and Hibs are about even in all atm. Mids have it harder in PVE and RvR defence though while Hibs have it abit harder in Fg Vs Fg ? (or atleast fewer ?)

Also atm, Mids seem more together and cooperative than Hibs. (except for when you step on the toes of the treehuggers by hogging their relics that is! But that always changes with time!

/Charmangle

 

[Phule_Gubben]

I just made a small comparision between the 2 servers top 10 alliances and came up with this.

1. Members

Albion: 1.426 members

Hibernia: 1.400 members

Midgard: 1.507 members

2. RP's

Albion: 59.005.178 rp's last week

Hibernia: 58.205.645 rp's last week

Midgard: 62.088.651 rp's last week

3. Characters

Albion: 3.009 toons

Hibernia: 2.499 toons

Midgard: 2.661 toons.

I know it doesn't show everything you'd want in there but still shows some vital stats of what's going on right now, or atleast last week.

One funny thing that shows here is that Albs has most characters and Mids the most members. But then again there's more numbers in the shadows since only the 10 best/biggest/badest alliances are showing. Thou I think it's pretty even overall.

 

[xxManiacxx]

I understand why mids have more rps this past week atleast

 

[Shike]

You can't compare active chars - the comparishion for underpopulated is done on active members/accounts.

and exactly comments like that is the reason I typed in what I typed, since the % for all realms of alts should be relatively the same. No realm is special when it comes to the players habits regarding alts etc.

 

[Javai]

and exactly comments like that is the reason I typed in what I typed, since the % for all realms of alts should be relatively the same. No realm is special when it comes to the players habits regarding alts etc.

However in a game called Dark Age of Camelot you would expect to find more casual and potentially less rvr orientated players in the relam associated with King Arthur. Which if you are making the argument for rvr bonuses they ought to be based on rvr active characters not all characters. I'm not competent with XML but would be nice to see the stats for those characters earning say 50k rps in last week. Or 20k if you think 50k is a bt steep.

 

[Shike]

However in a game called Dark Age of Camelot you would expect to find more casual and potentially less rvr orientated players in the relam associated with King Arthur. Which if you are making the argument for rvr bonuses they ought to be based on rvr active characters not all characters. I'm not competent with XML but would be nice to see the stats for those characters earning say 50k rps in last week. Or 20k if you think 50k is a bt steep.

if it indeed was so that albs was less RVRorientated, albs would have much lower RPs overall though I think. Hibs have a ton of casuals aswell, so does mids.

And yes, would be nice to see how many in each realm there is with like, 20k LWRPs. Then we would see exactly how the RVRactive population is divided on the UKcluster.

 

[Javai]

if it indeed was so that albs was less RVRorientated, albs would have much lower RPs overall though I think. Hibs have a ton of casuals aswell, so does mids.

And yes, would be nice to see how many in each realm there is with like, 20k LWRPs. Then we would see exactly how the RVRactive population is divided on the UKcluster.

Well if you just do simple adding of guild rps over the two servers you get (roughly)

58.9 million for Alb
58.2 million for Hib
62.0 million for Mid

We'd need this for a period of a few weeks though as it matters a great deal who has had ports where, who has been defending etc.

 

[Phule_Gubben]

Well if you just do simple adding of guild rps over the two servers you get (roughly)

58.9 million for Alb
58.2 million for Hib
62.0 million for Mid

We'd need this for a period of a few weeks though as it matters a great deal who has had ports where, who has been defending etc.

Scroll up and check my post for some stats of last week.

 

[BlackrazoR]

Probably get shouted down about this but IME Albs have more Alts and do more PvE than Mids and in turn Mids have more Alts and do more PvE than Hibs. Hibs are very RvR-centric whereas many Albs can't spell RvR but have 100 level50 Alts.

 

[Raven]

actually i dont know anyone that doesnt have at least 5 level 50s on hib, lots and lots of animist teams around, some people even having their own 4/5 man group of them...

 

[Shike]

Probably get shouted down about this but IME Albs have more Alts and do more PvE than Mids and in turn Mids have more Alts and do more PvE than Hibs. Hibs are very RvR-centric whereas many Albs can't spell RvR but have 100 level50 Alts.

animists, ML9chanters, mentabots, buffbots.. you name it, many hibs have it. Albs arent unique in that way. And it is funny that albs claim they cant RVR, when albs have most RPs totally without that many more active toons more than any other realm. Dont underestimate the power of the million scouts and casterzergs.

 

[Zapsi]

Well hibs have it back how ever they figurged it out.

 

[Icebreaker]

actually i dont know anyone that doesnt have at least 5 level 50s on hib, lots and lots of animist teams around, some people even having their own 4/5 man group of them...

I have only 3 Level 50's and working on another!

 

[Rhayn]

Looks to me as if Mids aint underpopulated at all.. like some mids whine about.

LoL. Who cares really ? Only whine I've seen about this is from jealous hibs that want it back.

 

[Shike]

LoL. Who cares really ? Only whine I've seen about this is from jealous hibs that want it back.

heh, we actually got it back So it seems mids have nothing at all to whine about, as Ive said before.

Level Reward Bonus Camp Bonus RvR Bonus Hookpoint Purchase

Albion 7 80% 0% 100%
Midgard 6 97% 0% 100%
Hibernia 3 103% 5% 50%

 

[Phule_Gubben]

I wonder how they actually sort it out, it can't be numbers of players since it's pretty even all over since cluster, and the fact that many play on 2 realms. To me it's just ridiculous and I can't see why any realm needs it tbh.

 

[Puppet]

I wonder how they actually sort it out, it can't be numbers of players since it's pretty even all over since cluster, and the fact that many play on 2 realms. To me it's just ridiculous and I can't see why any realm needs it tbh.

If the number of players is 'pretty even all over since cluster' to you, then I doubt the bonus makes a difference at all. The gains from the bonusses are less then the population-difference in percentages.

 

[Phule_Gubben]

If the number of players is 'pretty even all over since cluster' to you, then I doubt the bonus makes a difference at all. The gains from the bonusses are less then the population-difference in percentages.

is dat so? then you'd be just fine without it then? and to you it's not that even population across realms or?