Big Ugly said:how sad...just look at that
they couldn;t even find 3 lvl50 thanes but had to invite a lvl40 one![]()
Bah! Thanes are so overpowered they only need to be lvl 40 to do proper RvR!Big Ugly said:they couldn;t even find 3 lvl50 thanes but had to invite a lvl40 one![]()
Urme the Legend said:The only reason the first group got any RP's was because of Kindar (warrior)![]()
Archeon said:Besides... anyone with half a brain knows Kindar spends his free time making daisy chains and baking cookies![]()
Kalba said:Archeon, what is this. Why wasnt I invited?![]()
Archeon said:Urme stop spreading such evil lies. It was all me... and maybe Kilix (a little) that carried that group, all you Warriors say you don't duel healers because it isn't a challenge but we know the truth - your afraid, so very afraid
Besides... anyone with half a brain knows Kindar spends his free time making daisy chains and baking cookies![]()
Bhalage said:and toy swojds afaik
:]
Archeon said:This is a discussion on the Viability of Thane Gank Groups - if I remember correctly at the time this particular screenie was taken you were off playing with another guild. Its pretty old![]()
To be totally honest i'm not even 100% sure it was an RvR group, it was kind of a shoddy screenie. But I figured the picture of the group window would make for an interesting discussion .
I mean think about it, Thanes are defensive hybrids - which means that they rely less on support in the form of healing than Savages, their also able to cast and insta interupt which could make them the bane of caster groups.
Really the only things holding them back are their Hit Points and Weapon Skill tables. That and their inability to gain access to Determination, but with any luck that'll be addressed in 'New Frontiers' - i'm not holding my breath but I wouldn't be too surprised if one day Thanes will become an indespensible part of the 'Gank Group' setup.
Edit - Forgot to add in their inability to Evade, poor blighters their the only tank in Midgard without this ability![]()
kirennia said:Not their inability to do any damage whatsoever then?![]()
kirennia said:Not their inability to do any damage whatsoever then?![]()
Archeon said:Actually truth be told i've been lvling a Thane recently, I know its not the same as RvR but he's still got a respectable dmg output against orange/red cons. He's not even fully SCed![]()
yaruar said:with the existing and upcoming changes to stormcalling we are starting to be able to do reasonable damage, although having gone toe to toe with a reaver whilst buffed the other day whilst bored and soloing in emain i cried when I was doing 60 damage a pop on the odd occasion i hit when he was hitting me for 200+
And that's with a full sc setup.
Sanzor said:60?? Sounds weird. I have pretty much fun in bg3 with my norse Thane fooling around. Last time i hitted a Pally was something like 150 damage.
Maybe the reaver was ubah buffed with that damn AF buff. Or the dude specced AP? 0_O
Bhalage said:tbh i think no tank can solo a reaver 1on1, stlongest and most evull melee char ever (thou they lack determ for gank style rvr i know i know before someone mention it but still.. u know what im talkin about)
Sanzor said:Reavers are good 1 vs 1, but i wouldn't say they are the best. My call would be a Thane or warrior instead. Nothing beats a good brutalize and a 2h cleaving those albs ! >![]()
lemme guess..you a hammerthane? those tincan pallies must go down pretty easySanzor said:60?? Sounds weird. I have pretty much fun in bg3 with my norse Thane fooling around. Last time i hitted a Pally was something like 150 damage.
Maybe the reaver was ubah buffed with that damn AF buff. Or the dude specced AP? 0_O