Pricecheck.

Joined
Dec 31, 2003
Messages
1,875
I would like to know if anyone is interessted in buying a Banes ring: 30 con, 30 charm and 11% cold resist. 62 UV.

and

Soul spectral anchor (a.k.a. SSA) 30 str, +5 slash, +3 stealth and +6% spirit resist. 72 UV.
(both banes ring and SSA is none tlw raid itmes got them with Flesh :D )
 

Bubble

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
5,355
emmm 1p each?
SSA might be okay for pve so i guess 2p
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2003
Messages
1,875
Bubble said:
SSA might be okay for pve so i guess 2p

I would choose SSA in a minstrel temp any day over malice or battler. But i would choose battler if i was to poor to get the good jewelry needed to cap toa dmg stats.
 

Bubble

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
5,355
Most would take Malice or battler now, SSA is a nice PvE weapon for exping artifacts
 

Loch

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
994
I'd prolly go for malice too if I was gonna rvr, but just gonna toa minst for pveing stuff x<
 

SoulFly

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,803
TLW raid loot was released for sale AGES AND AGES ago.

SSA's nice. End proc on a char which has to DD, which eat end = :x

SSA DUR & COND?
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2003
Messages
1,875
SSA lost 4 con so 130-4 = 126 left?

Only used it in RvR so no worries :p

And Bubble+Loch, SSA > battler and malice anyday of the week aslong as u can get the stats u want anyway.
 

Loch

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
994
.. No :p Malice has a better proc, the added advantage of Arrogance charge, str cap and 5% style dmg, and overall better stats, whereas SSA just doesn't ^^

If someone really wanted an end proc weapon for pve, they'd most likely go for a Storm Struck Falchion, 40 point end proc, with +10 str/con caps, which just r0x x<
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2003
Messages
1,875
Well using malice will take away lots of hits, +15 con +5 con cap = 20 con and then 40 hits cap. i would guess on a buffed person thats around 140-150 hits?

+5% style dmg is an argument but since ssa is slower it will have a higher frontload dmg. 4.1/4.4 makes SSA ~7% slower then malice/battler. Then the battle between malice or ssa comes down to the proc ( I wouldnt wanna use malice charge in battles who might take a along while since its not that fun fighting a high rr ranger (for example ) use malice to gain advantage of him, then he uses battler and u will have lost alot ABS and be 50% melee weak for 10s. Ah well its alot of ifs and buts when it comes down to choosing malice/battler or SSA. I rather have no ifs and buts and just do more dmg and having an end proc ;) ...
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2003
Messages
1,875
Gorse said:
4 plat on SSA

Mind you this is no 'real' acution, not yet atleast just curious what ppl think its worth and of anyone needs it ( understand how valueable it really is ) ;)
 

Speeedy

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
421
Would now say ToA end procers like ml7.10 battlespark axe > SSA... but, SSA still a very good weapon for anyone out there that need a endo proc weapon
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2003
Messages
1,875
Speeedy said:
Would now say ToA end procers like ml7.10 battlespark axe > SSA... but, SSA still a very good weapon for anyone out there that need a endo proc weapon

4.4 spd vs 3.7 ? = an obvious choice. + SSA got higher UV, is black with red flames and is a sword no ugly gothic looking axe :p
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom