Pentagon 9/11

[Tom]

And what if the brakes were tampered with? The driver may have been faultless...

:touch:

A subsequent investigation would prove that. Just as subsequent investigations have detailed the collapse of the towers.

 

[Aada]

I dont think the Pentagon was hit by a plane.. no parts of the plane were ever found.. surely if a plane crashed into the building there would be a hole bigger then what was left....

 

[Wij]

I dont think the Pentagon was hit by a plane.. no parts of the plane were ever found.. surely if a plane crashed into the building there would be a hole bigger then what was left....

Yes, please ignore all the discussion on the previous pages. It makes it much easier for you.

 

[dysfunction]

If bombs were planted within the Twin towers wouldnt you see and hear the explosions??

I seen quite a few controlled demolitions of buildings and there is a lot of noise from the explosives! I didnt see anything like that anywhere near the twin towers on the news.
They were smouldering at the tops where the planes hit and thats it! It then toppled from the top downwards....it did not collapse at the bottom like a controlled building demolition.

And the 757's wings folded onto the fuselage when it hit the Pentagon and therefore made a smallish puncture hole. It then burst into flames and consumed itself.

These two conspiracy theories are crap...

 

[Ukle]

Pentagon no plane documentary

52 minute documentary about the conspiracy theory idea. Scaned through the post but dont think its been posted in here before.

 

[Jonaldo]

52 minutes.. someone give me the low down on what gets said please*





If possible could you please translate into Essex for me as I'm a bit simple like that.

 

[Wij]

52 minutes.. someone give me the low down on what gets said please*





If possible could you please translate into Essex for me as I'm a bit simple like that.

Like the metal birds were supposed to have made fire on the steel mountains but maybe it was not true !!!

 

[Ukle]

Same as the standard stuff - Pentagon was a Bunker Buster not a plane and the towers exploded a bit 'odd'. Just puts all the parts of the conspiracy idea in one documentary.

Its all crap really but as long as the pentagon dont release pictures of the plane* then it will go on for ever :/

* Assuming that there was more then one camera covering that wall in what is supposed to be one of the most guarded buildings in the world.

 

[Jonaldo]

Like the metal birds were supposed to have made fire on the steel mountains but maybe it was not true !!!

4 shor/

oh m8"


this bolke i no has an xr3 and says he cud make a bom dat cud blow sutf up leik bildings n shit. 4 rel!

 

[Jonaldo]

Same as the standard stuff - Pentagon was a Bunker Buster not a plane and the towers exploded a bit 'odd'. Just puts all the parts of the conspiracy idea in one documentary.

Its all crap really but as long as the pentagon dont release pictures of the plane* then it will go on for ever :/

* Assuming that there was more then one camera covering that wall in what is supposed to be one of the most guarded buildings in the world.

I do find it a bit odd that they insist on holding onto any hard evidence and video footage that can, in effect prove all conspiracy theorists wrong but yet they always seem to let these things drag on.

Perhaps it's all just another part of the long term 'misinformation' program they've been running since Roswell and possibly a long time before that.

 

[Paradroid]

If bombs were planted within the Twin towers wouldnt you see and hear the explosions??

I seen quite a few controlled demolitions of buildings and there is a lot of noise from the explosives! I didnt see anything like that anywhere near the twin towers on the news....

Here? (See the Seismograph entry halfway down the page) I believe the video footage immediately below it has been debunked, but the seismograph doesn't lie, there were strange explosions/tremors just as the towers collapsed.

 

[Aada]

Yes, please ignore all the discussion on the previous pages. It makes it much easier for you.

Yes i couldnt be arsed reading.. thanks

 

[Tom]

Here? (See the Seismograph entry halfway down the page) I believe the video footage immediately below it has been debunked, but the seismograph doesn't lie, there were strange explosions/tremors just as the towers collapsed.

And you don't think that the collapse of the floors above the impacts would produce a much larger spike than the planes crashing into the towers? Thats a hell of a lot of concrete slamming down.

Which produces more vibration? Dropping a heavy book onto a wooden floor from 1 inche up, or throwing a dart at the book stood on its end?

 

[Paradroid]

And you don't think that the collapse of the floors above the impacts would produce a much larger spike than the planes crashing into the towers? Thats a hell of a lot of concrete slamming down.

Which produces more vibration? Dropping a heavy book onto a wooden floor from 1 inche up, or throwing a dart at the book stood on its end?

I think the site explains it better than I could, it also shows the point that the planes hit the building - the seismologist thinks it's strange and they work with this stuff.

 

[Ukle]

They work with events that are normally coming from deep underground though and not caused by planes hitting an object hundreds of feet above ground :/ Cant imagine above ground level Siesmology is a field with a lot of experience and given the unique nature of the twin towers event it probably offers little value.

 

[Driwen]

They work with events that are normally coming from deep underground though and not caused by planes hitting an object hundreds of feet above ground :/ Cant imagine above ground level Siesmology is a field with a lot of experience and given the unique nature of the twin towers event it probably offers little value.

seismographs register explosions of mines(the one that paradriod showed apparently did) and probably also of collapsing of big buildings that get demolished, so I expect that there are some experts that can give educated guesses what the graphs mean.

 

[Paradroid]

Yeah, stop asking me! I'm not a seismologist! Read the link, go to a seismology website or something! The sky is blue due to the diffraction of light through gases in the ionisphere!

...although I did specialise in communications @ uni (electromagnetic waves through different mediums - so I suppose it's the same ballpark)....

 

[Tom]

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html

Interesting article, I found it while thinking about moon hoax stuff.