H
I
ilienwyn
Guest
- Thread starter
- #2
As Lasux says on chat that is done independently of realm. People that wouldn't do that are quite rare if not non-existant...
O
old.Icebreaker
Guest
- Thread starter
- #3
Mids doing the same with Hibs at Bledmeer.
So shut up
So shut up
K
Kagato.
Guest
- Thread starter
- #4
Hahaha thats funny, mids talking about Honour after pulling of the lamest and most pathetic relic raid yet?
D
del_eneste
Guest
- Thread starter
- #5
fuck off mids talking about honouredit: oh and ofc Mids would never do the same..! they'd let every single alb log back in and then attack
H
Herbal Remedy
Guest
- Thread starter
- #6
thanks for showing us your plans m8 such help to know mid inc with trebs again
Y
-yoda-
Guest
- Thread starter
- #7
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
dumbasses .. i bet every single person in this game has logged/ld'd in a rvr zone and came back to a fg+ or outnumberred to get wtf pwnd by the enemy...
and im sure if the tables were switched your so called HONOURABLE dumb ass guildys would allow all the albs to regather and form up into a zerg again (not bloody likley) im 100% certain mids would do EXACTLY the same thing and kill people logging in.
A
Aussie-
Guest
- Thread starter
- #8
jesus christ the irony
A
Aussie-
Guest
- Thread starter
- #9
so you guys have 230 lvl 50s at 2.20 am
k
k
A
Antedeluvian
Guest
- Thread starter
- #10
Bah, stfu guy, be happy we didn't gone to take more keeps instead.
A mid using the word "honour" is a sad joke nowadays.
A mid using the word "honour" is a sad joke nowadays.
A
Antedeluvian
Guest
- Thread starter
- #11
WHILE mids were still logging on, so imagine the real number of lvls 50 at 3 AM....
H
Haldar
Guest
- Thread starter
- #12
/em looks over his antiflame suit.
/em finds out that it is still in good condition.
=====================================
if u insist that u, by killing ppl who are logging back after server crash, have done a completely normal thing, which is a part of war - then u have no fucking right to moan about alarmclocks - as they are part of war too.
vot urodi! (c) Brat-2
/em finds out that it is still in good condition.
=====================================
if u insist that u, by killing ppl who are logging back after server crash, have done a completely normal thing, which is a part of war - then u have no fucking right to moan about alarmclocks - as they are part of war too.
vot urodi! (c) Brat-2
H
Haldar
Guest
- Thread starter
- #13
Re: Re: On honour.
if wishes were fishes we'd all throw nets.
if wishes were fishes we'd all throw nets.
A
asar
Guest
- Thread starter
- #14
HaHa
That last sentance rox
When albs take 1 keep with sum numbers u guys say allrdy: Lets pick-up our gear and move to mjollnir?
That last sentance rox
When albs take 1 keep with sum numbers u guys say allrdy: Lets pick-up our gear and move to mjollnir?
T
telaron
Guest
- Thread starter
- #15
Alarmclockraid and defending a keep from 170 enemies at prime time is the same thing, how?
It's not like those mids logging in and die don't have a chance of coming back.
F
fl3a
Guest
- Thread starter
- #16
... which is actually 11:20 gmt
I
iorlas
Guest
- Thread starter
- #17
So much Honour in alarmclock rr ...and then set alarmclocks to take back a keep at 7.30am.Albs atleast have the backbone and guts to try at primetime.
H
Haldar
Guest
- Thread starter
- #18
yeah, good point fl3a, i live in gmt+3 zone IRL
imo we _all_ should follow 1 of 2 ways -- "honorable" or "normal"
honorable means -- no alarmclocks, no killing of lowbies in DF, no use of numerical advantages (kiss albion 42% byebye), no use of minstrels as CCing from stealth, SoSing and wallclimbing class - only as speedbot and fgvsfg CC (suppose bof=savages in power), and no killing of logging ppl.
normal means - fight as u want.
i prefer 2nd way. And - for dumb ones - the screen i posted was meant to show that albion doesnt fit in the "knight in the shining armor" outfit, as they lack that honour.
imo we _all_ should follow 1 of 2 ways -- "honorable" or "normal"
honorable means -- no alarmclocks, no killing of lowbies in DF, no use of numerical advantages (kiss albion 42% byebye), no use of minstrels as CCing from stealth, SoSing and wallclimbing class - only as speedbot and fgvsfg CC (suppose bof=savages in power), and no killing of logging ppl.
normal means - fight as u want.
i prefer 2nd way. And - for dumb ones - the screen i posted was meant to show that albion doesnt fit in the "knight in the shining armor" outfit, as they lack that honour.
I
ilienwyn
Guest
- Thread starter
- #19
First, check your own picture to see that even mids do that. Hell, everyone does that.
As for your problem with minstrels using CC from stealth, well say your savages not to take determination then and to avoid quads
T
telaron
Guest
- Thread starter
- #20
You're really stupid...
Numerical advantage -> There's a reason alb supportclasses have lower utility then mid/hib supportclasses. Our tanks does less damage then mid and our casters are gimped.
Why should minstrel only be speedbot? They get the abilities because mythic thinks the realm of albion needs it. Wether you think it's overpowered or not is irrelevant.
It's like saying mid/hib is dishonorable if they use tanks hitting harder then ours, or casters nuking for more damage then ours.
Using realm abilities to your advantage is not to compare with alarmclock. One is abilities given in game that can and should be used in advantage for the realm. The other is taking advantage from a real life situation. I.e when majority of the players still sleep.
H
Haldar
Guest
- Thread starter
- #21
ok, lets take flies apart from meat.
lets forget about classes and their abilities. they are designed by mythic and will stay as is - unless changed in patches. good.
but numerical advantage of albion on excal server has nothing to do with supposed lower utility of ur supporters. as u say, it is irrelevant here. albuin having 42% of total population -- and outnumbering Mid and Hib in battles has nothing to do with classes.
So the question stands.
Will Abion agree to reduce their attacking numbers by 25% when going to Mib and by 40% when going to Hib (Mid pop = 75% of Alb, and Hib pop = 60% of Alb) ??
Suppose u came as 4 fg to ATK in Odins. Will u go out for Bled as 3fg, leaving one behind to guard buffbots in atk?
Guess no.
Hehe, just imagine lotto -- "who will stand here and wait as the rules of fair play demand? /random 100 all! lowest stays here!"
lol.
And typical EM rvr...makes me /laugh
W
Wiro
Guest
- Thread starter
- #22
Which language was that PM stuff tbh?
H
Haldar
Guest
- Thread starter
- #23
language is Russian, written in Latin letters. Most of Cyrillic letters are translated to Latin ones as is, but some are using combination of them.
T
telaron
Guest
- Thread starter
- #24
Originally posted by Haldar
ok, lets take flies apart from meat.
lets forget about classes and their abilities. they are designed by mythic and will stay as is - unless changed in patches. good.
but numerical advantage of albion on excal server has nothing to do with supposed lower utility of ur supporters. as u say, it is irrelevant here. albuin having 42% of total population -- and outnumbering Mid and Hib in battles has nothing to do with classes.
So the question stands.
Will Abion agree to reduce their attacking numbers by 25% when going to Mib and by 40% when going to Hib (Mid pop = 75% of Alb, and Hib pop = 60% of Alb) ??
Suppose u came as 4 fg to ATK in Odins. Will u go out for Bled as 3fg, leaving one behind to guard buffbots in atk?
Guess no.
Hehe, just imagine lotto -- "who will stand here and wait as the rules of fair play demand? /random 100 all! lowest stays here!"
lol.
And typical EM rvr...makes me /laugh
Considering mids have outnumbered albs in the mid frontier basicly every day the past week, ofc we won't.
Furthermore the albion population advantage is nothing unique with excalibur server. One can only hope that that is the reason why our classes get lower utility.
H
Haldar
Guest
- Thread starter
- #25
Considering mids have outnumbered albs in the mid frontier basicly every day the past week, ofc we won't.
that is ur problem, not ours.
that is ur problem, not ours.
M
Mavl
Guest
- Thread starter
- #26
lol@Zub TT
P.S. I would find it VERY strange if mids didnt do that in the same situation.
P.S. I would find it VERY strange if mids didnt do that in the same situation.
A
Antedeluvian
Guest
- Thread starter
- #27
So when we outnumber you is lame/zergling/noobish/etc, BUT, when mids outnumber us is fair, right?
Double standards make baby jesus cry fyi, clueless n00b.
N
noaim
Guest
- Thread starter
- #28
If you want to outnumber us, we cant do shit about it. Kinda like you cant defend against an alarmclockraid if we want to do one.
You can bring enough people to outnumber us, but you have not, that makes it your problem, not ours.
H
Haldar
Guest
- Thread starter
- #29
ouch! double standards, yeah?
u albs whine about no-honor morning raid - and u are doing a dishonorable thing by killing ppl who are logging into game. So who is following double standards here? lamer.
And if u'd bothered read my posts, u'd know that i personnaly wont give a flying fart about honor and fair play. i beleive that everything is ok in this game as long as it is allowed by mythic and goa. But ppl like u, who shout about honor and do dishonorable things afterwards, make me laugh.
And we are not playing "what if" games here. I dont care what would happen if Mids were defending captured ALb keep and albs were attacking it during crasg time, or if Mid had 42% of population, or Herbal himself played savage along with Lac, Outlaw and Gunner...the deeds are done, and deeds are to be judged, not intentions.
PS. And what are you, little zergling, to call me "clueless n00b"?
M
marczje
Guest
- Thread starter
- #30
hypocrites xD