- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 36,691
Has been tried before, but will probably catch on this time because: Google.
But what I don't get is why the BBC journalists who cover this don't get the fucking sack for massive and obvious incompetence:
Apart from the english in that sentence looks like it's been written by @Job - are google going to bring their servers and put them outside my house so my wi-fi can reach their servers?
What a fucking shower
Either way - if the controller talks to google via the internet (as opposed to your machine, then google via the internet) then the only latency saving I can see over other streaming services is the time it takes for your PC to decode the controllers actions and send on - i.e. none at all.
I guess it'll be in-sync - so at the end of the day, there'll be at least a, say, 40ms gap between movement and change. Presuming google is running it's servers pretty damn close by.
But what I don't get is why the BBC journalists who cover this don't get the fucking sack for massive and obvious incompetence:
Gamers have complained of issues with "lag" - the delay between a player performing an action, and the game reacting to that move.
In an attempt to avoid this, Google said its Stadia controller which will connect directly to Google's servers via wifi.
Apart from the english in that sentence looks like it's been written by @Job - are google going to bring their servers and put them outside my house so my wi-fi can reach their servers?
What a fucking shower
Either way - if the controller talks to google via the internet (as opposed to your machine, then google via the internet) then the only latency saving I can see over other streaming services is the time it takes for your PC to decode the controllers actions and send on - i.e. none at all.
I guess it'll be in-sync - so at the end of the day, there'll be at least a, say, 40ms gap between movement and change. Presuming google is running it's servers pretty damn close by.