...at Numeracy anyway says the OECD survey 1st out of 24 western countries.
I just wondered if there was anything we could learn about how you teach maths over there - do you separate kids into different ability groups for example?
Gwadien said:Well, behavior and ability, IMO. Link teachers together with kids that can handle harder classes etc, and get more out of them, don't just put all the clever but disruptive kids in with those that want to succeed, 'cos then you'll bring them down. There was a kid at my school in year 7 who was doing Pythagoras theorem in his head, he was Polish, so they automatically put him in the bottom maths group, took them a year to put him in a higher group.
Pythagoras in your head is a piece of piss.
at 11/2? Mind you he was in a group of kids that couldn't spell their own name.
at 11/2? Mind you he was in a group of kids that couldn't spell their own name.
Maths is such a weird subject. I had a really good discussion about it with a professor whilst on my travels. I wasn't very good at maths at school. I scraped a C in my GCSE, I was uninterested in classes and found (certain things) very difficult. However I LOVED physics. The idea of learning maths with no application - just learn how to solve these equations - did not appeal to me. I didn't understand why it needed to be solved, so I couldn't solve it. Certain branches of maths I found of some interest, such as Statistics, because I could sort of see a point to it (ironic I suppose, as the validity of statistics is so often discussed). Applied mathematics, however, I found extremely interesting and always did really well in.
My mother is a maths teacher and spent hours trying to convince me that pure mathematics was useful and relevant, but I felt that with a good grasp of mental arithmetic (something I was strong at from a fairly early age), why did I need to carry on doing maths to learn how to solve a quadratic equation or a matrix?
If you can do a square root in your head (which I learned how to do when I was 8-ish) you can do Pythagoras. Simultaneous Linear Equations in your head, now that's impressive - it is possible but I could never keep track of everything.
fettoken said:Misread as "Neanderthals rules!"
Education has changed. Just because you learn Pythagoras later does not automatically mean your education is worse. However, in this case it probably isSo you're basically telling me that our education has got so bad that kids are now trying to do their 7-8-9 times tables at 9 and you were doing square roots at 8?
So you're basically telling me that our education has got so bad that kids are now trying to do their 7-8-9 times tables at 9 and you were doing square roots at 8?
Are you talking about Teeds?
kids are now trying to do their 7-8-9 times tables at 9
multiplication tables (up to 13)
According to Pointless 61 out of 100 didn't know that Waterloo was Napoleons final battle.
I suppose so. I'd definitely done my multiplication tables (up to 13) waaaay before I was 9. I can literally remember the first time I did square roots for homework - because I got cocky and I completely fucked it up, and I'd never done that before. I was mortified.
Job said:Just what we need..numeracy skills when you can type algebra into the google search box and and everyones got acomputer in their pocket.
the point isn't always simply getting an answer, a lot of maths & science in school is intended to teach kids how to problem solve which is a rather useful skill
Exactly...just teach them what maths isBecause the brain is a muscle (a bone in your case, but I digress) and needs exercise. It's difficult to Google something if you don't even know what it is in the first place.
old.Osy said:guis guis, relax. You no worry becoz mathematics, vee east-europeans got this, okey?
http://www.csi.ucd.ie/news/united-kingdom-and-ireland-programming-contest-ukiepc-results
(For those that don't get it, 5 out of 10 teams are comprised of romanian nationals)
*smug*