Message for the HeadHunters

O

old.[cF]niCO

Guest
After the UKTL match HH vs cF (tie), 5 anonymous players (with the tag : [RAINBOW]) played with us on a public server and began to annoy everybody with taunts and comments. Then they began to criticize personally the cF about our "good aptitude for suicide spamming".
We understood that [RAINBOW] = anonymous [HH].
Some HH players sent me emails to ask me not generalize this attitude to all their members.
I don't want to waste more time with this. If the HH have imature players in their team this is their problem, not us.
--
[cF]niCO
 
O

old.[BaM] mac

Guest
Yeah it was sad, you guys told me Zippy was dead and thats out of order
wink.gif


mac
 
O

old.Shelob

Guest
It was only 1 or 2 that had a go at cF because they were a little miffed at cF criticising HH in #Uktl after the match.
As for annoying everyone with taunts, if u mean the occasional 'Dance' like most players do then you are right.
I personally don't have a grudge with cF, and the Rainbow thing was just a laugh and not an attemot to conceal my identity, hence me being sure to use my 'I still have me bananas bind'
You say its HH's problem, but obviously it is one for you too, as you have posted here.
I hope you can forget about it and not hold a grudge against HH.

Shrapnel
 
O

old.Alco

Guest
Well, Like shrap said, there were a few of us playing as [Rainbow] (for those who dont remember, rainbow was that sad, kids tv show with the dodgy bloke and weird animals), purely for a laff, and as far as I know, we werent annoying anybody else, unless they're annoyed by being shot :p (We joined random sides btw, not ganging up on a server or anything lame like that). And it definately wasnt a deliberate act to annoy cF, altho u guys must have thought it a pretty big deal to bother posting it to a public bulletin board... Sure, ONE person then moaned a bit about cF grenade spamming, but you obviously didnt notice the rest of us NOT joining in with that. Again, sorry to anyone who took offence, but the person in question was probably just smarting a bit from cF's bad loser attitude at the end of the game (yeh i know u didnt lose, but its the same attitude), where first comments were all 'nice defence HH, couldve tried attacking' type stuff.. Was a hard played game from both sides, with cF's renowned heavy attack probably being a bit more effective during the flag sieges, but I can assure you, we wanted 3 points, not 1.

|HH|Alco.
 
O

old.Crunchy

Guest
It was me having a moan at cF on the pub server. I went over the top so I apologise for that. I was pissed off for various reasons. cF openly accusing HH of playing for a draw in #uktl after the match. We never play for a draw, we play a balanced team of offence and defence. In addition I have bad fps and modems suck so Tribes can be pretty frustrating.
 
O

old.zach

Guest
“cF openly accusing HH of playing for a draw in #uktl”

I find that amusing because shortly before BL called it a day we played a day we played a couple of friendlies against cF. These were pretty enjoyable games but whenever a standoff occurred cF always defended in heavy numbers, never committing more than 1 or 2 people in attack.

At the time a took it as a complement to BL’s offence that cF felt they had to defend in such heavy numbers but none the less it made the rest of the match incredibly boring.

- NeaRly
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom