Fana said:When it comes to dealing out and sustaining damage i dont think there is anything that beats thai
Fana said:Best selfdefence though is running, or not placing oneself in a situation where you have to fight.
Lamp said:The supreme martial artists are the Chinese who have been practicing shaolin kung-fu since they were 5 years old. Those guys are seriously dedicated, skilled, and have transcended the physical to a spiritual level.
Fana said:Unfortunately there has never been a mixed martial arts champion (or even high level contestant) with a primarily kung-fu background, and i would also go as far as to say its more or less worthless for selfdefence since it relies heavily on your opponent "playing by the rules" so to speak. Flashy styles and techniques simply do not work in real life situations, and i think it does more damage than good to convince someone that his kung-fu training will stand up to someone high on drugs attacking him, or someone thats been lifting weights for 10 years, or someone from a kick/thaiboxing background. Most irl fighting situations end up with one person overpowering the other by sheer agressivity and physical presence, it isnt like in the movies where you can dance around and throw high kicks and line someone up for a throw etc. Good conditioning is always nice but you can gain that from any diciplin.
Vilje said:Drunken boxing > all![]()
For you who have seen the Drunken Master movies![]()
Fana said:Unfortunately there has never been a mixed martial arts champion (or even high level contestant) with a primarily kung-fu background, and i would also go as far as to say its more or less worthless for selfdefence since it relies heavily on your opponent "playing by the rules" so to speak. Flashy styles and techniques simply do not work in real life situations, and i think it does more damage than good to convince someone that his kung-fu training will stand up to someone high on drugs attacking him, or someone thats been lifting weights for 10 years, or someone from a kick/thaiboxing background. Most irl fighting situations end up with one person overpowering the other by sheer agressivity and physical presence, it isnt like in the movies where you can dance around and throw high kicks and line someone up for a throw etc. Good conditioning is always nice but you can gain that from any diciplin.
Lamp said:Bruce Lee came from a kung-fu background and later blended many elements of other styles into his own martial art which he called Jeet Kun Do.
When I was out of work many years back I did door security work (aka "bouncer") at a late night bar. I regularly had to deal with drunken idiots and people high on coke and ecstacy, and used jitsu to deal with various situations. What no one has mentioned in this thread so far is that a large percentage of rucks end up on the ground, which means that anyone with any training in effective ground techniques and dirty tricks is at an advantage in these situations. Its NOT like the movies. I can tell you that from personal experience. Its unpleasant work and I wouldn't like to do it again.
I disagree with the statement that proponents of kung fu rely on opponents playing by the rules. Wing Chung is a kung fu derivative. My next door neighbour is a brown sash in Wing Chung and having trained with him a lot I can tell you they are more than capable of reactive effectively to unpredictable and non-conventional attacks.
There are no "rules" in a ruck. And what kind of martial art would advertise its efficacy if it only taught you to defend yourself against a set syllabus of attack forms ? The skilled martial artist adapts and improvises his knowledge, whatever the discipline.
Agree that purely flashy moves have limited application. I was onced challenged on the mat in a closed session by a karate black belt (he said he was a 4th dan). I took him down in under a second. But that doesn't mean anything. It could have gone the other way of course if he made contact with me before I closed on him.
Its important that you find the right teacher for you. A teacher that encourages aggressiveness over control (I have seen many examples of this in the karate world, sadly)(although this is only a small % of senseis) will promote aggressiveness in their students.
Food for thought perhaps.
Pera said:I ve been thinking for a long time to start learning some self defence techniques. However, I ve been a swimmer for 15 years and that took almost all my time. Now that I am out of college and out of the competitive swimming world I would like to start getting into the Martial Arts.
I don't know a whole a lot about what Martial Art is for what but I do know what I want to accomplish. First of I am not willing to learn something so that I will kick someone's ass. What I am looking for is mostly defence oriented rather than attack. I also would like to stay as fit as possible meaning lots of cardio work. I used to swim about 5-6 km a day so I would like to get that much or close cardio done. Lastly, I am 22 years old 6'3 (1.93cm) and 90kg.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Blackjack said:Aikido is very defensive, about as defensive as you getyou could look into that
Pera said:Seems a little too "passive"? like a little too stable. How bout something more active like something that will evolve jumping rope, punching bag, etc.
I'd say WT (WIng Tzun or however you want to spell it) is a VERY active defense. It's more of an attack actually, I'm starting again after a year off and looking forward to it.Pera said:Seems a little too "passive"? like a little too stable. How bout something more active like something that will evolve jumping rope, punching bag, etc.
Sorry I am total noob at Martial Arts. But I would like to get as much cardio as possible and also work out at the same time. I just hate running or cycling and would like to combine my cardio with my work out. I am not sure if I am being 100% clear but hope you get the idea.
Lamp said:Agree. Aikido is excellent for self defence.
Aikido, karate, ninjitsu, and judo were fighting systems that derived from jui-jitsu. Jui Jitsu was the style of unarmed combat used by the samurai when they lost their weapons on the battlefield and was utterly lethal.
The style of jitsu I teach can be learnt by anyone of any height or weight. You don't need to be strong. Its highly effective self defence but doing it will not make you fit. There are plenty of styles out there the practice of which will improve your fitness / physiche. My style is not one of them. To stay fit, therefore, I supplement my martial art with swimming, running, rowing, and light weights work.
The best thing is to try out a few styles and pick the one thats right for you. Check out your local papers / local internet web sites for self defence classes in your area. If you're uncomfortable in any class, or if it doesn't feel right, then it probably isn't the one for you.
Good luck !
Read mine, read mine! ;pPera said:Thanks for the reply. I think "time" is my problem currently. I work full time and also do a little bit of weight lifting. So I don't think I will have time to lift weights, do ji jutsu, and cardio. Thats why I would like to combine my cardio with the martial art.
Tasslehoff said:Read mine, read mine! ;p