old.Tohtori
FH is my second home
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2004
- Messages
- 45,210
This was on the banking thread;
First, Gorb, i know that's not what you mean but it got me thinking)
And i didn't want to derail as it's a very taboo thing here
D), so made a new thread.
So;
If information would cause large scale panic, hysteria, or some other such "mass effect"(without porn scenes), should information be limited?
Let's take an example;
Meteor might hit earth. All could die. Possibility is at a 99% that the government can blow it up and no harm will cmoe to humanity. information of said meteor would cause mass panic, looting etc. Death-promise-chaos really.
Should the government tell about it or not?
I dont know about you, but i'll rather have all the information delivered to instead of some media mogul deciding what i should and shouldnt know.
It has a name too. Its called independent media. Its not supposed to serve business interests.
First, Gorb, i know that's not what you mean but it got me thinking)
And i didn't want to derail as it's a very taboo thing here
So;
If information would cause large scale panic, hysteria, or some other such "mass effect"(without porn scenes), should information be limited?
Let's take an example;
Meteor might hit earth. All could die. Possibility is at a 99% that the government can blow it up and no harm will cmoe to humanity. information of said meteor would cause mass panic, looting etc. Death-promise-chaos really.
Should the government tell about it or not?