I RvR

[uspe]

dont understand the moaning and the QQ for taking bk keeps and cutting I RvR.
whats rong with agrammon island????

 

[Coldbeard]

!!!!?????????????????

 

[Mastade]

dont understand the moaning and the QQ for taking bk keeps and cutting I RvR.
whats rong with agrammon island????

The question here is actually.. what is wrong with people not understanding what is wrong with Agramon.. Its funny how it doesnt occur to you that there is a reason why the small community of FG rvrers made constant threads about who was gonna go to agramon this and that day, and why they made a channel on irc especially for the purpose of FG rvr in Agramon. People wont bother spending their time on getting people for their group, go out to Agramon only to find out 1 hour later that its totally fucking deserted, or that there is only one other group in agramon.. from the same realm.

So what is so fucking great about irvr?, you see.. When there is irvr, people are more willing to make a fg and go out in rvr. You know why?, cuz if there aint other groups out to fight you can atleast go join in on the chaos that is irvr(mindless zerging/adding). More and more groups have it that way and that is the reason why the FG vs FG activity is also higher when there is irvr, even tho it might not be the actual zerging/adding around that they are looking for..

All in all, irvr boosts up the rvr activity ALOT, and when there aint irvr, the cluster is close to dead.

Does this make any sense for you?

 

[Muylaetrix]

All in all, irvr boosts up the rvr activity ALOT, and when there aint irvr, the cluster is close to dead.

Does this make any sense for you?

as long as no irvr excist for longer than 24 hours in the same spot, i think noone will object.

every day a new spot for irvr...

keep it longer on the same spot an you risk relic raids.

 

[Pirkel]

as long as no irvr excist for longer than 24 hours in the same spot, i think noone will object.

every day a new spot for irvr...

keep it longer on the same spot an you risk relic raids.

Normally I don't touch these rehashed discussions with a 10 foot pole. However this post I just had to reply to as the idea is brilliant.

IRvR 24 hour max per realm ... it gives all the irvr'ers their precious irvr. It gives the people who enjoy sieges their keeptakes and defends every single day... and there is no (or at least less) risk of artifact raids.

 

[Kinetix]

irvr

Well for once i have to agree with that....might actually be a good idea...we just have to know if all realms would respect this agreement...:touch:

 

[pip]

I agree irvr ftw, but has to be in alb Good fun by the villa Mid is to closed,hib is ok but not as open as alb

 

[swords]

Who needs relics?

 

[liloe]

I RvR aswell, but thanks for letting us know =)

 

[pip]

as long as no irvr excist for longer than 24 hours in the same spot, i think noone will object.

every day a new spot for irvr...

keep it longer on the same spot an you risk relic raids.

Relics can be taken back early hrs, so no problem with relics? thats just a poor excuse not to have irvr,anyway if you do lose relics gives the night squad something to do

 

[Kagato]

Whilst I hate irvr, I do actually have to agree with people here. If the location of irvr changed realms every day or even every couple of days I wouldn't mind it that much and I would imagine alot of people would be less objecting to it.

New locations, new terrain, new tactics and sieges for those that enjoy them.

 

[xRedfieldx]

Normally I don't touch these rehashed discussions with a 10 foot pole. However this post I just had to reply to as the idea is brilliant.

IRvR 24 hour max per realm ... it gives all the irvr'ers their precious irvr. It gives the people who enjoy sieges their keeptakes and defends every single day... and there is no (or at least less) risk of artifact raids.

Think u mean Relic Raids, not artifact raids

 

[uspe]

so if majority of the ppl wants IRvR why not having it permanent
for example albs have notts and crim
mids have berk and bolg
hibs bled and era

 

[Mundokar]

so if majority of the ppl wants IRvR why not having it permanent
for example albs have notts and crim
mids have berk and bolg
hibs bled and era

Because that would spread the crowd to much.

 

[Mastade]

Only problem is that the realms actually defend, atleast if its primetime. And that it requires someone to attack.

 

[cmr]

albion is the best place to have it, plus theres not much threat of someone PvEing the albion relics because we all know which realm is best at that FACT no arguement about it and even if they do get taken you can have fun PvEing them back the next day anyway so whats the big deal? Too stupid and arrogant to see whats best

 

[Xajin]

albion is the best place to have it, plus theres not much threat of someone PvEing the albion relics because we all know which realm is best at that FACT no arguement about it and even if they do get taken you can have fun PvEing them back the next day anyway so whats the big deal? Too stupid and arrogant to see whats best

hi, I'm a random. Who are you?

 

[Tarsus]

albion is the best place to have it, plus theres not much threat of someone PvEing the albion relics because we all know which realm is best at that FACT no arguement about it and even if they do get taken you can have fun PvEing them back the next day anyway so whats the big deal? Too stupid and arrogant to see whats best

Perhaps you're right about albion being the best place (i like emain most). Thing is though, not all albs like the idea of having a couple keeps ocupied by the enemy indefinitely.

Then you got Mids. They don't even want to give irvr a chance when it's open on bled or whatever. It's killed off almost as soon as it's opened.

I would have enjoyed some irvr over there simply for a bit of a change so I like the idea of moving irvr around. It gives regular DF access too for those who want to farm seals and such.