Hope this will help...

[asar]

After some nice numbers like alb got 70% of server population I was hoping that duskwave would come back up soon, coz ill bet it wouldn't take long or they would say alb got 150% of server population (dont ask me how)


-----------------------Albion-----------Hibernia-------Midgard----------Total
Characters---------10,044 (44%)-----5,784 (25%)---6,908 (30%)------22,736
Active Characters--6,370 (43%)------3,860 (26%)----4,624 (31%)--------14,854
Level 50's----------2,930 (42%)-------1,810 (26%)----2,232 (32%)--------6,972

 

[Pandemic]

mmm they really need an active number of lvl 50 characters ideally also done by those who visit the rvr zones although that might be hard to do

 

[asar]

yes

thats true... but still, aint that much difference (i mean count 300 lvl 50 necro's of it, they nver RvR)

 

[noaim]

Looks to me like the people who said mids outnumber hibs as much as albs outnumber mids, were wrong.

 

[asar]

Originally posted by noaim
Looks to me like the people who said mids outnumber hibs as much as albs outnumber mids, were wrong.

well:2,930 1,810 2,232

2,930-2,232 = 598 albs more then mids.
2,232-1810 = 532 mids more then hibs.

so thats: 598-532 = 66 chars difference, between albs more mids and mids more then hibs.

(my math sux so dont whine when i calculated wrong)

 

[Garbannoch Nox]

Originally posted by noaim
Looks to me like the people who said mids outnumber hibs as much as albs outnumber mids, were wrong.

looks to me like these numbers are from before the alarm clock raid; mid population will go up ~3% over the next couple of weeks

 

[killrake]

Re: yes

Originally posted by asar
thats true... but still, aint that much difference (i mean count 300 lvl 50 necro's of it, they nver RvR)

Just like our SMs that are in lair all time

 

[-RG-Jaond]

Re: yes

Originally posted by asar
thats true... but still, aint that much difference (i mean count 300 lvl 50 necro's of it, they nver RvR)

or count 300 lvl 50 sm's/healers that never rvr, just me got acces to 3x50sm and 4x50 healer, so it's same in all realms, and Yes alb got more population and zerg more etc etc...

 

[- Fedaykin -]

Re: Re: yes

Originally posted by killrake
Just like our SMs that are in lair all time

and just like our infils who are all retired and never even venture near amg

seriously though a sm > necro in RvR

 

[Pandemic]

Originally posted by Garbannoch Nox
looks to me like these numbers are from before the alarm clock raid; mid population will go up ~3% over the next couple of weeks

u missed an 0 there mate

 

[noaim]

Originally posted by asar
well:2,930 1,810 2,232

2,930-2,232 = 598 albs more then mids.
2,232-1810 = 532 mids more then hibs.

so thats: 598-532 = 66 chars difference, between albs more mids and mids more then hibs.

(my math sux so dont whine when i calculated wrong)

I am glad you put that disclaimer in at the end...

 

[hiban]

What noaim said

 

[bracken_woodman]

Would be more interested to see number of active 50s over rr4. Active level 50s may not equate to active rvr chars. Also would be interesting to see numbers of active rvr-friendly classes.

 

[angrykid]

I would be even more interested in seeing numbers of accounts on each realm! that would be more proving about population than this character thingy, since as you all know, there's room for 8 chars on each account.

 

[asar]

.

Originally posted by noaim
I am glad you put that disclaimer in at the end...

why? calculated wrong?

 

[noaim]

Re: .

Originally posted by asar
why? calculated wrong?

Well I get 2930-2232=698

And 2232-1810=422

Which would mean 698-422=276

 

[asar]

Re: Re: .

Originally posted by noaim
Well I get 2930-2232=698

And 2232-1810=422

Which would mean 698-422=276

help me to remind i never psot things like this again

 

[-RG-Jaond]

Originally posted by bracken_woodman
Would be more interested to see number of active 50s over rr4. Active level 50s may not equate to active rvr chars. Also would be interesting to see numbers of active rvr-friendly classes.

Why would that be intresting?

Would only see 20% of the albs

 

[Asha]

these numbers don't really mean anything
# of active accounts with a lvl 50 would give a far better picture
especially if you could somehow weed out the bot accounts
even better if you could ignore the ones who don't rvr at all
I think anyone who RvRs knows that Albs have a huge population compaired to Hibs and a good size advantage over mids.

I don't know why any hib or mid would complain about this though, I would love it if there were loads of brehons running around.

 

[-RG-Jaond]

Originally posted by Asha
I would love it if there were loads of brehons running around.

maybe cause warders/brehons/skiltvaktens tend to zerg alot?

 

[hiban]

Re: Re: Re: .

Originally posted by asar
help me to remind i never psot things like this again

hahah

 

[jaapi]

Originally posted by bracken_woodman
Also would be interesting to see numbers of active rvr-friendly classes.

All chars are RvR friendly, some peeps just don't get it.

 

[marczje]

70% was never a relevant accusation, these numbers show the actual numbers .. albs having 14% more chars is just plane insane, as mentioned many times already.

 

[marczje]

Originally posted by jaapi
All chars are RvR friendly, some peeps just don't get it.

Or you don't seem to get a thane without det, lower hp table is just way less functional then a warrior in a grp with only 8 spots to fill up.

 

[marczje]

Re: Re: Re: yes

Originally posted by - Fedaykin -
and just like our infils who are all retired and never even venture near amg

seriously though a sm > necro in RvR

True, but a necro > sm in plvl.

 

[Vodor]

Saying only rr3+ rvr is rather misleading, i cant count the amount of warders i see everyday.

Poon