Halow preview on barrysworld and GAME

X

xenon2000

Guest
Sheesh... reviews as well as site design getting nicked?! Some people really are wankers.
 
X

xenon2000

Guest
It's a c&p job, it's hardly gonna magically change authors now, is it? :rolleyes:
 
M

Moving Target

Guest
Originally posted by xenon2000
It's a c&p job, it's hardly gonna magically change authors now, is it? :rolleyes:

And what makes you think that eh?
 
O

old.Kez

Guest
I like the way you all imply there's something wrong with them doing that.

Shame then that BarrysWorld & Game are both owned by the same parent company.
 
M

Moving Target

Guest
Game paid him to give it 10/10. Just so people would buy it.. :eek:
 
W

whipped

Guest
Does it matter? Whether the review was written for GAME and put on BarrysWorld or vice versa doesn't really matter. What's matters is that after much, much to long a gap, BarrysWorld is finally getting some content.

I for one hope it continues. Oh and btw, CJ is a console loving freak ;) So maybe he actually thought it deserved 10/10 ;)
 
O

old.Kez

Guest
Then why is it even in question? It just makes sense to do it the way its been done.
 
S

Sar

Guest
I think it looks shite - only able to carry 2 weaps at a time?

Piss aff.

Oh and the marvellous "revolutionary" AI? Sounds no better than what HL did 3½ years ago...
 
X

xenon2000

Guest
In that case their such wankers for copy/pasting and not bothering to get a different reviewer for a wider scope.

:p

(PS. yeah, I'm really shit today :()
 
C

Ch3tan

Guest
What would the point be in paying a different person to do the same content for the same company?
 
M

Munkey-

Guest
still feel that GAME provides a more "BUY BUY BUY" feel. something bazworld shouldnt have
 
M

Mr B

Guest
Are a company directly selling games ever likely to give even an exceptionally average game a shitty review?

Then again, who knows what backhanders PC magazines are getting from games companies these days - it was bad enough 4/5 years ago (and yes I've worked for one before, so don't come the "raw prawn" and say "I'm sure they are purely objective" :))

Reviews aren't worth doing IMO (I only buy PC magazines if I've got a mention in them somewhere - ie hardly ever), the only way to see if you will like the game is to go and get a demo of it. Reviews ARE good for screenshots and general fact finding about a game, but as for whether I trust the subjective opinions of the reviewer, well that's another thing.

:)

B
 
W

Wij

Guest
ffs.

BW and GAME are part of the same company. What's wrong with them sharing reviews ??

Halo has been given 10/10 or 90+% all over the shop. Since you haven't played it any comments along the lines of it only getting that score so GAME can sell more copies are completely unjustified. Halo has squillions of rave reviews from ppl who have played it whereas you are just a bunch of whing0rs :D
 
O

old.supergroover

Guest
Originally posted by Wij
Since you haven't played it any comments along the lines of it only getting that score so GAME can sell more copies are completely unjustified.

but probably true anyway

perhaps bw shouldn't be taking its game reviews from a games retailer?

i'd suggest getting a trusted third party to write them, or making them totally user-driven like the ShackNews ones

everything is just pimping, and looks lame
 
S

Sar

Guest
Originally posted by Mr B
and yes I've worked for one before, so don't come the "raw prawn" and say "I'm sure they are purely objective" :)


Which mag did you work for?
 
C

Ch3tan

Guest
Originally posted by supergroover


but probably true anyway

perhaps bw shouldn't be taking its game reviews from a games retailer?

i'd suggest getting a trusted third party to write them, or making them totally user-driven like the ShackNews ones

everything is just pimping, and looks lame

They are NOT taking them from a games retailer, GAME and BW are part of the same company, the people that do the online content for one are also hired to do it for the other. Why do some poeple still have trouble understanding this?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom