1) If I didn't thread, and it was in random spam, people wouldn't see it, and therefore I wouldn't of got help.1) Didn't need a thread for this
2) Do you know what those words mean in isolation? Gives a pretty big clue, unless there's some weird political use.
1) If I didn't thread, and it was in random spam, people wouldn't see it, and therefore I wouldn't of got help.
/facepalmIt was a joke based on thread title. So the thread title is at least accurate
What does perpetuity of tenure mean? - If it helps.....
Speaking of "Those who have set up perpetuity of tenure for the Irish occupier as their favourite scheme," Mr. Gladstone disclaimed anything— dishonourable, anything that intends any injury to another's on their part, because we have not a doubt that they have seen that inasmuch as perpetuity of tenure on the part of the occupier is virtually expropriation of the landlord, and as a mere readjustment of rent according to the price of produce can by no means dispose of all contingencies the future may produce in his favour, compensation would have to be paid to the landlord for the rights of which he would be deprived… But suppose for a moment that we put the financial difficulty out of view, what would be the effect of perpetuity of tenure upon the tenant? As I understand it, the scheme itself amounts to this—that each and every occupier, as long as he pays the rent that he is now paying or else some rent to be fixed by a public tribunal charged with the duty of valuation, is to be secured for himself and his heirs in the occupation of the land that he holds, without limit of time.
The 1870 Land Act had failed because there was no guaranteed perpetuity of tenure.
So, basically, I assume because there was no actual time set between the land lord and the tenant for how long the tenants would stay on the land for.
It means the British were greedy bastagers basically
Happens in almost all countries that are occupied by a foreign power, just opportunists with either a bad family reputation or nothing to lose making the most of the power shift.
I was merely pointing out that it was extremely arrogant to think that the British could rule Ireland so long as the sun rose over Great Britain and yet people who were born/died there for generations were giving a limited tenancy ? The "They were only a bunch of backstabbing cunts anyway" line doesn't really work on that one sorry.
Im not bitter i just find the logic funny is all.