SAS
Can't get enough of FH
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2003
- Messages
- 1,004
Due to the lack of juicy news items today I've been persuaded by Mazling to post about a topic. So here's goes...
There is news of Spiderman 3 the game being developed, but Spiderman 3 is still in script form, and we have yet to see Spiderman 2 (due to hit the big screen soon). Why has the game and movie industry decided to launch so many game tie ins? You may think it's down to the money but is that the sole reason?
The Matrix with its 'Animatrix' animated pre-sequel, and the game tie in was designed to add more to the storyline, making you play the game to understand more of the matrix story. The game was pretty poor, which sadly seems common with movie game tie in, but did it serve its purpose of giving a better understanding of the story line, and add to the overall Matrix experience?
#FreddysHouse IRC user Spinky’s comments> The game was supposed to explain the origins of the matrix, though that I felt it was designed for milking. I would have preferred to keep some mystery in how the matrix began, without knowing who started the war and all that.
Van Helsing which I recently had to sit through has an animated pre-sequel. The game is also available. While I sat through the film I could see where the action was scripted just for a game purpose and I felt as though I was watching a game with scripted cut scenes rather than a film. Numerous movie sites have commented Van Helsing was scripted to fit in with a game, and a Van Helsing TV series… This could have spoiled an otherwise good film?
What are your views? Could a game tie actually add to a film experience? Are games companies better off creating a game after the films are made, and not have the film edited around a game which recently seems a common place in Hollywood.
There is news of Spiderman 3 the game being developed, but Spiderman 3 is still in script form, and we have yet to see Spiderman 2 (due to hit the big screen soon). Why has the game and movie industry decided to launch so many game tie ins? You may think it's down to the money but is that the sole reason?
The Matrix with its 'Animatrix' animated pre-sequel, and the game tie in was designed to add more to the storyline, making you play the game to understand more of the matrix story. The game was pretty poor, which sadly seems common with movie game tie in, but did it serve its purpose of giving a better understanding of the story line, and add to the overall Matrix experience?
#FreddysHouse IRC user Spinky’s comments> The game was supposed to explain the origins of the matrix, though that I felt it was designed for milking. I would have preferred to keep some mystery in how the matrix began, without knowing who started the war and all that.
Van Helsing which I recently had to sit through has an animated pre-sequel. The game is also available. While I sat through the film I could see where the action was scripted just for a game purpose and I felt as though I was watching a game with scripted cut scenes rather than a film. Numerous movie sites have commented Van Helsing was scripted to fit in with a game, and a Van Helsing TV series… This could have spoiled an otherwise good film?
What are your views? Could a game tie actually add to a film experience? Are games companies better off creating a game after the films are made, and not have the film edited around a game which recently seems a common place in Hollywood.