robbe said:r> cabbies being a fotm skilless class could be a good
yeah and that is it, they nuke so hard and have too many hp's.. also thier other spells are pretty good imo tbh
this is what me and everybody in realm of the midgard thinks
Lets not compare a RM with a pet classVoltage said:So lets compare to say a runemaster!
Zebolt said:Lets not compare a RM with a pet class
Better to compare lifetap with lifetap imo :>Voltage said:it was either that or spiritmaster, and I didnt want to compare with a pbae class.
Voltage said:Okiedoke
Cabalist:
Baseline lifetap: Damage: 179 (Body), speed 2.5s
specline lifetap: Damage: 174 (Body), speed 2.5s
Spiritmaster
Baseline lifetap: Doesnt exist
Baseline dd same as runie
specline lifeta: Damage: 183 (cold), speed 2.5s
cabalist:
Avalonian: 45 base con
Briton: 60 base con
Inconnu: 60 base con
Saracen: 40 base con
spiritmaster:
Norseman: 70 base con
Kobold: 50 base con
Frostalf: 55 base con
so basically we have the old dispute as to whether its better to spec for a stronger dd and no variance, or go for the debuff, have to cast an extra spell but then hit for more damage once its up.
robbe said:r> they nuke so hard and have too many hp's.. also thier other spells are pretty good imo tbh
Voltage said:Now the only thing that I am aware of that gives casters hit points is con and +hits, and +hits are equal for every realm... so only thing that can possibly give cabas "too many hps" is their starting con, so I compared their starting con to mid casters starting con.
Maeloch said:My guess is this isn't the real issue anyhow - the original poster was prolly trying to melee down a moc'ing cabbie or something, so prolly seemed like it had 4000hps.
Mael, 50th ment
Zebolt said:Better to compare lifetap with lifetap imo :>
He didn't tho if you read his post. He compared spec nuke with lifetap ^^Old.Ilum said:Comparing self debuffer with self debuffer makes sense tbh