Stekkerdoos
Fledgling Freddie
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2004
- Messages
- 139
I just saw a post on the Blizzard boards again about female armor being skimpy, offending etc. Im not talking tauren here
I don't think its that bad (well at least not the majority of the armor ), it fits the game style, it fits the models. At least there is a very clear difference between males and females next to the shape of the body. Less coverage means less protections isn't an issue either, it's a fantasy game. Who says magic doesn't play a part and if you want to get realistic, looking at the models they wouldn't last long in full plate armor. Maybe the physically weaker females (looking at the models) are faster/more agile making up for the lower coverage.
Since it seems to be a returning issue on the blizzard boards I was wondering what the freddyshouse people thought about this.
I don't think its that bad (well at least not the majority of the armor ), it fits the game style, it fits the models. At least there is a very clear difference between males and females next to the shape of the body. Less coverage means less protections isn't an issue either, it's a fantasy game. Who says magic doesn't play a part and if you want to get realistic, looking at the models they wouldn't last long in full plate armor. Maybe the physically weaker females (looking at the models) are faster/more agile making up for the lower coverage.
Since it seems to be a returning issue on the blizzard boards I was wondering what the freddyshouse people thought about this.