Don´t Cluster!

Evergrey

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Messages
152
Requiel or whomever is in charge!, its really not needed to merge Excal and Pryd, RvR population is good as it is on both servers FFS. :(

w8 another year or so :wanker:
 

Gamah

Banned
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
13,042
I agree, the people who logged on to prydwen tonight..want that kinda RvR x 2.5+ are you SURE it's what you REALLY want :E
 

LawBringer

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Sep 8, 2004
Messages
331
Im pryd - I said Non - RvR seems fine to me - bit quiet in the BGs but that's n biggy - Hibs went for their relic - some gr8 3 realm fights - Pryd is by no means dead - quiter than excal for sure but much nicer ppl :) (except the mids they smell)
 

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
So does this clustering mean that their merging together the english servers?

Not really familiar with the concept of clustering.

If this IS so, what's the bad thing about merging the servers?
 

Outlander

Part of the furniture
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
3,069
I think it will posibly be too busy after clustering, will have to wait and see.
 

LawBringer

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Sep 8, 2004
Messages
331
I think the sort of clustering they are going for means merger of RvR and Capital City - so NF / BGs / City etc will be shard between the 2 servers when you change to those zones, I assume this must include DF aswell as it is effected by Keeps (towers soon) owned. Not sure what happens with the rest - ie do you get a choice to go Exc or Pryd ToA area for instance :) - personally think Pryd is fine but the voting is done and majority rules.
 

Amelyn

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
427
old.Tohtori said:
So does this clustering mean that their merging together the english servers?

Not really familiar with the concept of clustering.

If this IS so, what's the bad thing about merging the servers?

Server Clustering
 

Saggy

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
1,237
old.Tohtori said:
If this IS so, what's the bad thing about merging the servers?
GOA-webby said:
- if a player has never played on one of the two servers, he will be able to create characters on both servers, but only on the same realm ! This point is particularly important for the English servers since, if they are clustered, those who don't already have characters in two different realms will only have access to a single realm (on English servers and with the exception of Camlann) even if they change their server.
Kinda sucks for new players :p
 

popa

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Apr 26, 2004
Messages
672
Saggy said:
Kinda sucks for new players :p

what new players ? :p better now thei have to concentrate on 1 realm soo get faster at rr10 :D
 

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
Amelyn said:

Grattis potatis.

Well it is true that it would suk for the players who wanted to try the other realms. It was hard before and now it would become a major tom i an airplane up the wazoo. Pain. Thought you got it.

A good idea, but would be a bit more limitful. I like the idea of one war, one battleground, travelling to other servers for buying/questing purposes, but is it really worth loosing the possibility to play in two places? Don't know. Ofcourse one realm was always enough for me, but there are crazier players around who would want to try it all.
 

Tilda

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
5,755
The thing is, half or 2/3 of the groups on pryd have come back, just because they know theres going to be clustering. Take any chance of clustering away and pryd rvr is practicly non-existant.
 

Shanaia

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
1,673
Tilda said:
The thing is, half or 2/3 of the groups on pryd have come back, just because they know theres going to be clustering. Take any chance of clustering away and pryd rvr is practicly non-existant.

Bullshit, even in the lowest dip when the leet players screamed out that rvr was non-existant RF ran a group 5 days a week and was doing fine ... there was plenty of action you just had to find the zone it was in ... all those people that came back for clustering will be gone a month after it because it won't bring what they hope.

People think that with clustering the RvR will spread out over the frontier more so you get clean 8 vs 8's all over the frontier ... I don't think this is gonna happen .. I think it's going to be zergalicious
 

eble

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
409
RvR is what you make it.

I play solo, but most days I arrange for a raid in mid/alb and take a twr or 2 and bash a few keeps and create the action for myself.

On Excal I believe RVR is alive and well and I honestly haven't ran into 'the alb zerg' for months not sure it even exists anymore.

I only know a very little about RVR on Alb/Pryd and its seems a lot of action is at Beno Keep, tbh if you dont want to find scouts/albs in numbers stay clear, not as if you dont know they will be there.

It will take a while for RVR to balance and people to find there place in the new larger setup, but I think it will all work out fine.

Eble
 

Overdriven

Dumpster Fire of The South
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
12,907
Am I the only one who prepared for this? oO

Got characters on:

Mid/Pryd
Alb/Excal
Hib/Excal


I never tend to stick to one realm and use to end up deleting alot... So I just used my BB account on Hib and my main on Alb so I can play what I want when I want :-o

Though, I CBA to level :[
 

Naffets

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
1,913
Overdriven said:
Am I the only one who prepared for this? oO

Got characters on:

Mid/Pryd
Alb/Excal
Hib/Excal


I never tend to stick to one realm and use to end up deleting alot... So I just used my BB account on Hib and my main on Alb so I can play what I want when I want :-o

Though, I CBA to level :[

I have hib/pry, hib/exc, mid/exc, alb/pry. Mostly hib though but still chars on each realm, and a buffbot on each aswell.

Back to topic, i think clustered rvr will work, and i look forward to fighting more fixed full groups rather that pugs. It will be difficult though because we cant have addless fights in heavily active zones without the zerg adding. Hopefully the action will split over two realms balancing it out a bit, if we're really lucky we might get the setup in alb that we all know and love, well, all of us in fixed groups at least.
 

Overdriven

Dumpster Fire of The South
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
12,907
Aye, totally agree with above.

The amount of FG RvR should just sky-rocket, I mean - there's some GGs running on Pryd atm but not many, but when the merge, I'm sure some Guilds will like to set an RvR group out.
 

Xxcalibur

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Jan 26, 2004
Messages
1,202
cry me a river losers ! like 90 % i know voted yes so stop cry!
 

old.Whoodoo

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
3,645
Question is how many of the whiners actually bothered to vote, prolly none of them and put it on their cba list.
 

mikke

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Apr 25, 2004
Messages
2,299
>< the reason the rvr is so good now is becouse alot of people have come back to ready theyr chars for clustering.. so if it wouldnt be any clustering it wouldnt be alot of rvr atm.. and this have been mentioned like 2000 times before.
 

Mabs

J Peasemould Gruntfuttock
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
6,869
Xxcalibur said:
cry me a river losers ! like 90 % i know voted yes so stop cry!

oh look, mr mono-sylabic came out from under his rock again, dont you honestly have anything better to do ? i have yet to see you post anything constructive, you sad excuse for a human being


and, er, isnt it a bit late to be complaining about clustering ? the community (those that bothered) voted with their feet so...
 

Rockk

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Apr 13, 2004
Messages
155
Id like to add that perhaps a few ppl are not happy with clustering.
but why is that ? i should say cus they have FG set and like to rvr against
trio´s and badly balanced fg´s MANY players have left the game. and to cluster would be to spice up the rvr a bit and is best Idea since
the first RA system imo.
everyone control their own char if u dont want zergs stay out of em
just cus of cluster dosent mean everyone need to run a 1 big family
it gives u a better ods of gettin well balanced full groups tho

GIVF CLUSTERING! :cheers:
 

Gamah

Banned
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
13,042
mikke said:
>< the reason the rvr is so good now is becouse alot of people have come back to ready theyr chars for clustering.. so if it wouldnt be any clustering it wouldnt be alot of rvr atm.. and this have been mentioned like 2000 times before.

RvR is good? Oh right I really enjoy going Beno -> Berks -> attack something -> get adds -> die -> Rince & repeat

If clustering brings spread out action to all zones they way hey...serve it up on a plate...if it just increases the huge zergs than it won't be a good thing.
 

Vulcan

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
405
Only thing myself and lots that went to WoW have seen that will temp us to come back
 

Ogen

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
1,384
Tbh, i still find zerg vs zerg fights amuzing.. Altho i havent really seen any of these for about 4-6 month. I believe this has something to do with the population in the game.
I hope the fgvsfg scene will be alot better aswell after clustering aswell. Hope to see more random low rr groups around aswell, as this is the only way to get higher rr.. Would be nice to see some of all these rr1-4 people in fg´s, and i think they would make more rp´s roaming like a fg, then they do in the zerg. Just thinking, atm there is allways like 4-6 low rr´s standing around in Druim ligen looking for a group. Now there will be 8 people there, so they can form one :) In theory ;)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom