Well in my superior political mumbojumbo knowledge, it means the common ethic(moral, what is good and what is not) and how using something would effect it.
It's like saying "It would go against ethics(meaning common ethics, believed by most people) to use this dildo as a blender."
Well, you could elaborate on your "yes", explain why it is ethical. Some points:
- Moral principle: 'beneficere': doing good
I suppose biofuel pollutes less than normal fuel. If not, put the polution thing under the next category .
- Moral prinicple: 'non malelficere': doing no harm
Any effects on long term use which should be tested before using it on large scale?
- Moral prinicple: egality
Is it cheaper/more expensive than normal fuel? If it's cheaper, it will be available to more people, which means that it promotes egality.
- Moral principle: freedom of choice
If people have moral objections against biofuel, they're not forced to use it. The people who do want to use it cause no direct harm to the first group of people, so there is no reason to limit their freedom of choice.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.