At that price they need to give away a free hd tv to shift them.
Sharma said:Seems people are coming to their senses that just because it's got "Playstation" written on it, doesn't mean that it justifies the £425 price tag.
They're still selling more per shop than the WII did, iirc.
So are the PS3's gonna sell out? is demand much higher for the units they had at release?
need answers, as I have one in front of me I wanna sell

Why you buying playstations?
sony have never yet made anything that fucking works properly, just crappily made stuff. did the net connection ever work on ps2? do their batteries melt on laptops?
sony are the macdonalds of electronics... there's better out there but kids buy them coz of adverts.
AVOID
Why you buying playstations?
sony have never yet made anything that fucking works properly, just crappily made stuff. did the net connection ever work on ps2? do their batteries melt on laptops?
sony are the macdonalds of electronics... there's better out there but kids buy them coz of adverts.
AVOID
I really do hope the Ps3 doest as poorly as possible. Sony can absorb the losses and actually get it right next time around. Yes i know its sold a fair few so far but those tend to be the ones who enjoy seeing a box with Playstation written on it by their TV.
Weather or not they make a loss on units its an absolute disgrace they charge 50% more in the UK than abroad, for a product 6 months late and with less features. In light of their average launch lineup too (Motorstorm, Resistance all got 80's reviews) theres simply no reason to buy a ps3 over a 360 or wii.
If it truely does way less than expected it will mean Sony actually have to put effort into designing a product that has a place in the consumer market, rather than making a luxury product people will buy down to brand loyalty, Something Sony have played on to sell units rather than having to rely totally on quality. It will also give sony and other console designers a reference of how not to do things in the future.
I really do hope the Ps3 doest as poorly as possible. Sony can absorb the losses and actually get it right next time around. Yes i know its sold a fair few so far but those tend to be the ones who enjoy seeing a box with Playstation written on it by their TV.
Weather or not they make a loss on units its an absolute disgrace they charge 50% more in the UK than abroad, .
They areOo and here was me thinking people who camped out over night at a shop to get the "first" of a new product were losers.
Again you must think its a disgrace that the 360 and Wii both do the same? the removal of a $13 chip has not made the ps3 price hike and more sensational that what the other two did. This same rubbish gets said all the time but its the same on everything its nothing to do with the PS3.
And the PS3 is still the cheapest Blu-Ray Player on the market. It will sell units because of that. Also the inclusion of the blu-ray has upset a lot of games fans that want to spend £250 on the latest greatest technology. But Sony made the choice to ship games on blu ray because either they wanted to push the technology or they wanted to make sure like the ps2 this consol will still be growing stong in 6 years.
So my way of looking at it. The format war Blu Ray seem to be winning that so if you want a player buy the PS3 alot cheaper than a standalone and you get a free games consol. Or even if its only a games machine if you think it will last 7 years (there is no way of knowing if it will) then its £60 a year thats not much at all is it.
But i have to agree the launch line up is weak they should have made sure MGS or Gran Turismo were ready at launch to show off the consol.
Again i still do not think this is anything new though GoW for me was the first truely great game on the 360 and that was released after a year.