O
Ono
Guest
Never read them.
D
dysfunction
Guest
- Thread starter
- #2
You dont know what you are missing.
They are better than films most of the time...
They are better than films most of the time...
T
TedTheDog
Guest
- Thread starter
- #3
Originally posted by Ono
Never read them.
We guessed
C
caLLous
Guest
- Thread starter
- #4
Books are soooo much better than films because you can let your imagination portray the imagery rather than having to go along with the director's vision. If that makes sense.
L
~Lazarus~
Guest
- Thread starter
- #5
Thats true. Which is probably why Ono doesnt read them.
a hamster on smack has probably got more imagination
T
throdgrain
Guest
- Thread starter
- #6
lmao
L
leggy
Guest
- Thread starter
- #7
Too many video game syndrome.
E
ECA
Guest
- Thread starter
- #8
Books require intelligence and imagination.
Hence we dont see bodhi or cage in here :-]
Hence we dont see bodhi or cage in here :-]
C
.cage
Guest
- Thread starter
- #9
Yeah, we're not intelligent enough to take every opportunity to blast people who make us look silly on the internet.
L
leggy
Guest
- Thread starter
- #10
Why's that?
I know plenty off thick people who read.
S
SilverHood
Guest
- Thread starter
- #11
Playboy doesn't count as reading
L
leggy
Guest
- Thread starter
- #12
Originally posted by SilverHood
Playboy doesn't count as reading
pfft shaven haven tbh... none of that upper class muck.
E
ECA
Guest
- Thread starter
- #13
C
caLLous
Guest
- Thread starter
- #14
Shut up ECA. :/
B
bodhi
Guest
- Thread starter
- #15
Nail. Head. Hit.
Just to give lamers like him more ammo, it won't come as a surprise to you that I don't read books unless I have to/really really want to. I'd take a film/PS2 game any day tbh.
L
~Lazarus~
Guest
- Thread starter
- #16
Each to their own bods.
Some ppl like reading, others dont. No surprise so noone should be blasted for doing something they dont want to.