Bizarre Death

Lamp

Gold Star Holder!!
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
22,950
At the 1994 annual awards dinner given for Forensic Science, AAFS, President Dr. Don Harper Mills astounded his audience with the legal complications of a bizarre death. Here is the story:

On March 23,1994 the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head. Mr. Opus had jumped from the top of a ten story building intending to commit suicide. He left a note to that effect, indicating his despondency. As he fell past the ninth floor his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast passing through a window which killed him instantly.

Neither the shooter nor the descender was aware that a safety net had been installed just below at the eighth floor level to protect some building workers and that Ronald Opus would not have been able to complete his suicide the way he had planned.

"Ordinarily," Dr. Mills continued, "a person who sets out to commit suicide and ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism might not be what he intended, is still defined as committing suicide."

That Mr. Opus was shot on the way to certain death, but probably would not have been successful because of the safety net, caused the medical examiner to feel that he had a homicide on his hands. The room on the ninth floor, whence the shotgun blast emanated, was occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously and he was threatening her with a shotgun. The man was so upset that when he pulled the trigger he completely missed his wife and the pellets went through the window, striking Mr. Opus.

When one intends to kill subject A but kills subject B in the attempt, one is guilty of the murder of subject B. When confronted with the murder charge the old man and his wife were both adamant. They both said they thought the shotgun was unloaded. Thed old man said it was his long-standing habit to threaten his wife with the unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her. Therefore the killing of Mr. Opus appeared to be an accident; that is, the gun had been accidentally loaded.

The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old couple's son loading the shotgun about six weeks prior to the fatal accident. It transpired that the old lady had cut off her son's financial support and the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the shotgun threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that his father would shoot his mother. The case now becomes one of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald Opus.

Now comes the exquisite twist. Further investigation revealed that the son was, in fact, Ronald Opus. He had become increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to engineer his mother's murder. This led him to jump off the ten story building on March 23rd, only to be killed by a shotgun blast passing through the ninth story window. The son had actually murdered himself so the medical examiner closed the case as a suicide.
 

Imgormiel

Part of the furniture
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
4,372
At the 1994 annual awards dinner given for Forensic Science, AAFS, President Dr. Don Harper Mills astounded his audience with the legal complications of a bizarre death. Here is the story:

On March 23,1994 the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head. Mr. Opus had jumped from the top of a ten story building intending to commit suicide. He left a note to that effect, indicating his despondency. As he fell past the ninth floor his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast passing through a window which killed him instantly.

Neither the shooter nor the descender was aware that a safety net had been installed just below at the eighth floor level to protect some building workers and that Ronald Opus would not have been able to complete his suicide the way he had planned.

"Ordinarily," Dr. Mills continued, "a person who sets out to commit suicide and ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism might not be what he intended, is still defined as committing suicide."

That Mr. Opus was shot on the way to certain death, but probably would not have been successful because of the safety net, caused the medical examiner to feel that he had a homicide on his hands. The room on the ninth floor, whence the shotgun blast emanated, was occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously and he was threatening her with a shotgun. The man was so upset that when he pulled the trigger he completely missed his wife and the pellets went through the window, striking Mr. Opus.

When one intends to kill subject A but kills subject B in the attempt, one is guilty of the murder of subject B. When confronted with the murder charge the old man and his wife were both adamant. They both said they thought the shotgun was unloaded. Thed old man said it was his long-standing habit to threaten his wife with the unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her. Therefore the killing of Mr. Opus appeared to be an accident; that is, the gun had been accidentally loaded.

The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old couple's son loading the shotgun about six weeks prior to the fatal accident. It transpired that the old lady had cut off her son's financial support and the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the shotgun threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that his father would shoot his mother. The case now becomes one of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald Opus.

Now comes the exquisite twist. Further investigation revealed that the son was, in fact, Ronald Opus. He had become increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to engineer his mother's murder. This led him to jump off the ten story building on March 23rd, only to be killed by a shotgun blast passing through the ninth story window. The son had actually murdered himself so the medical examiner closed the case as a suicide.

There was an episode about this on Homicide life on the street in 1996/7 ...old.... :p
 

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
SImply reminds us...the three b*tches from Hel are around at all times.
 

Dahakon

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
387
Was used in the introduction to the film Magnolia (that long boring shit one with Tom Cruise et al in it) so doubly old =(
 

Lamp

Gold Star Holder!!
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
22,950
Are any of the Darwin award cases real ?

Do we care ?
 

Ezteq

Queen of OT
Joined
Jan 4, 2004
Messages
13,457
hell no! twas entertainment where someone gets shot, what more does one want in life tbh :) great story even if its not real its pretty ingenious!
 

Levin

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
2,734
I think the best darwin award thing was the guy who put rocket engines on his car in order to make it go really fast. It went really fast, took flight and crashed him into the side of a nearby mountain. LOL! :worthy: It better be true!
 

Lamp

Gold Star Holder!!
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
22,950
Wasn't there a Darwin award for the guy who decided to have a wank between the blades of a Black & Decker power-sander who ended up electrocuting himself when he shot his load ?
 

Ezteq

Queen of OT
Joined
Jan 4, 2004
Messages
13,457
by far the funniest darwin award i read about was the one where the medical examiner was highly puzzled over the state of a corpse on his table, the dead guy was covered in hoof prints and a tyre track.

Turns out him and his mate went deer hunting (while pissed) didn't have guns so were trying to hunt the deer by running them over and something happened like he fell off the back of the truck and the deer all stampeded and trampled him so his mate tried to save him by driving up and scaring off the deer but ran his friend over in the process.

:clap:
 

chipper

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jan 15, 2004
Messages
1,874
quiet amusing and pretty poetic in a gruesome sense

karma's a bitch :p
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom