Battler or Bruiser as 2H?

Cirventhor

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
397
I'm getting Battler and Bruiser for my hammer wielding warrior (Battler can be hammer in 1.69).

My question is; which is the "best" to use as 2-handed?

I am tilting towards Battler as 1H because it fits my template better, and Bruiser as 2H because of Siege Lore (smash them keep doors down).

Any thoughts?
 

Rulke

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
2,236
Bruiser sucks tbh, and bloody hard to get.

Why not malice and battler?
 

Z^^

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
1,287
Don't listen to radar rulke!
 

Cirventhor

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
397
Oh, Malice can be hammer too?

Well, between them, which would you advice me to use as 2-handed?
 

Marczje

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 1, 2004
Messages
1,719
As when you know Battler can be hammer, you prolly also know Siegelore gets nerfed. Don't go Bruiser, go Battler
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom