F
flaky
Guest
i dont know which one to choose, sould u help me choose a bad ass video card that could support a game like ut03 or GR?
Originally posted by Jonty
ATi's drivers still aren't on a par with nVidia's, but with the raw performance the 9700 has, it doesn't matter all that much.
I agree, and you have to take into account I'm an nVidia fan boy That, and I had a bad experience with a 9500 Pro card which I was really looking forward to using. Scarred for life, or somethingOriginally posted by Embattle
I do have to agree with Jonty that they can be slightly more problematic, however many people won't have problems with either and tbh the gap between the two is very very very small
Well, wasn't that a pointless story? But now you partly know just why I love nVidia and not ATi (although I do respect them). If you're reading this I'm assuming you got bored with the above and skipped ahead cursing my name for wasting your timePicture the scene: Intel has just launched the Pentium 4 with much fan-fair. This is the all new, all singing, all dancing, 'must have' processor, back in the days when AMD were still fairly unknown in the desktop market. Add to this Dell, who had just launched a whole new range of desktop PCs, styled afresh in 'Midnight Grey and Ion Silver' in a market in which quite literally every other PC was in some form of beige. And so I bought a Dell, and a fine system it is too (£25M of profit per day can't be wrong ).
And now our story progresses a couple of years to Christmas 2002. The 32Mb GeForce2 MX in the Dell is struggling, and so, after much research, I purchase a Sapphire 9500, an undoubtedly amazing card. I get it delivered next day at great expense, eagerly install it, switch on and . . . *picture corrupt graphics in your head and unintelligble error messages.*
After many reinstallations, posts in support forums, and generally hours of heartache, I found out that the cryptic message meant my PSU couldn't handle the card's power requirements (trust me, you'd never guess this from the message). And so I bought a new Enermax PSU only to find Dell, when they built my system, utilised proprietary, not ATX, standards, so the PSU (and all other PSUs) were incompatible.
So I had to send the card back, which thankfully they refunded. I still have the Dell system, with the GeForce card, and an gorgeous, gold-plated, Enermax PSU gathering dust (although I dare say I will get around to auctioning it off at some point).
Matters were made worse when I found out that all nVidia cards which require a PSU connection, instead of leaving the user with corrupted graphics and quite literally pointless error messages, instead present the user with this lovely message . . .
The cards even deactivate unnecessary features and lower their clock speeds to compensate for such events, hence preventing the user from suffering the same fate as above.
Originally posted by flaky
cuz rite now i have a G4
[i]Legend ~ Category, Approximate Price, mid-2002, early-2003[/i]
Hard Core $399+ GeForce FX 5800 Ultra GeForce FX 5800 Ultra
Radeon 9700 Pro Radeon 9800 Pro
Enthusiast $299 GeForce 4 Ti GeForce FX 5800
Radeon 9700 Radeon 9800 / 9700 Pro
Performance $199 GeForce 4 Ti GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
Radeon 9500 Pro Radeon 9500 Pro / Radeon 9600 Pro
Mainstream 1 $149 GeForce 4 Ti / MX GeForce FX 5200 Ultra
Radeon 9500 / 8500 Radeon 9600 / 9500
Mainstream 2 $99 GeForce 4 MX GeForce FX 5200
Radeon 9100 Pro Radeon 9100 Pro
Value $79 GeForce 4 MX GeForce FX 5200 / GeForce 4 MX
Radeon 9200 Pro / 9000 Radeon 9200 Pro / 9000
True Although it appears the 9800 Pro is little more than a enhanced 9700 Pro in terms of performance. Which is no bad thing, don't get me wrong, but it is going to retail at high prices whilst the 9700 Pro ought to reduce in price That said, the 256Mb version ought to be interesting.Originally posted by Embattle
The 9800 is on pre-order now with real shipmemnts most probably next month.
Will we all cringe and have nightmares if we ask where it went?Originally posted by Wij
I used to have money