Armsman Love! well abit anyway

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
45,312
You dont see many tanks using legendary weapons, why would they vs high (50%) resists in fg vs fg combat? The armour resestance is still a valid point vs "classic" weapon damage.
 

Kagato

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
3,777
Raven said:
You dont see many tanks using legendary weapons, why would they vs high (50%) resists in fg vs fg combat? The armour resestance is still a valid point vs "classic" weapon damage.

My point is classic weapon damage is less common now, as are tanks in general the way the games going, and the tanks that are using slash shouldn't even be attacking the hero in the first place if there doing there job right.
 

Flimgoblin

It's my birthday today!
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
8,324
Kagato said:
My point is classic weapon damage is less common now, as are tanks in general the way the games going, and the tanks that are using slash shouldn't even be attacking the hero in the first place if there doing there job right.

fortunately that makes the lack of parry on an armsman less of a problem - leaving it just down to moose mainly...

Didn't think about the artifact LW things - how about activating battler as crush LW and malice as slash? ;)

All the fotms appear to be crush in albion these days anyway - since respecs came in to the game the "everyone uses slash" is less of an issue (everyone started off as slash, still probably the most common but not by nearly the same margin as it was)
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
45,312
well i am talking about the main melee damage dealing realm, midguard and savages, slash
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom