Gray
FH is my second home
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2003
- Messages
- 3,423
Since March i've been against a Trader who sold me a faulty fridge freezer which didn't work since the day i bought it, massive amounts of aggro in me trying to get a resolution has lead me to now go to the Small Claims Court to claim back my monies plus Claim charges.
The judgement has ruled in my favour because the trader has not replied to the courts or anyone else for that matter. Therefor he has to pay me - He has no other outstanding fines or payments against him (Done a background check) and it's been a week now and once again he is not playing ball.
After conferring with Trading Standards and the Courts, they suggest a Warrant of Control to get some enforcers out to his property and take goods to make up the value - When i read about this, it was my understanding that the charges for the enforcers would go ONTOP of what is already owed.
Confusingly though, when i've been going through it, the charge is DEDUCTED from what i am owed, so therefor i'm making a loss on it. This surely isn't right is it??
The judgement has ruled in my favour because the trader has not replied to the courts or anyone else for that matter. Therefor he has to pay me - He has no other outstanding fines or payments against him (Done a background check) and it's been a week now and once again he is not playing ball.
After conferring with Trading Standards and the Courts, they suggest a Warrant of Control to get some enforcers out to his property and take goods to make up the value - When i read about this, it was my understanding that the charges for the enforcers would go ONTOP of what is already owed.
Confusingly though, when i've been going through it, the charge is DEDUCTED from what i am owed, so therefor i'm making a loss on it. This surely isn't right is it??