Warlock said:What do you think about
40b/36m sorc + ice wiz + ice theurg ?
Edit: well, 40body/36mind sorc can do both CC and debuffs.tedStar said:how bout a 46/47 body sorc for leet debuffing?
Warlock said:Edit: well, 40body/36mind sorc can do both CC and debuffs.
Warlock said:Edit: well, 40body/36mind sorc can do both CC and debuffs.
AFAIR, Bittelitten offered this setup:
cleric (rej/enh)
cleric (rej/smite)
pala
reaver
friar (enh)
sorc (40b/36m)
wizard (ice)
theurg (ice/earth)
Warlock said:Edit: well, 40body/36mind sorc can do both CC and debuffs.
AFAIR, Bittelitten offered this setup:
cleric (rej/enh)
cleric (rej/smite)
pala
reaver
friar (enh)
sorc (40b/36m)
wizard (ice)
theurg (ice/earth)
Tholus said:Tbh what I fear most is what the great unbalance in numbers will bring to Excalibur.
The more "massive battle" approach in NF will create big problems to mids and, even more, hibs.
Regardless the alb specific fg setup....
Will any Realm here be considered "underpopulated" for keep maintinence costs?
Filip said:
what about SoS and AM? Yes I know SoS can be negated by speedwarp, but still SoS has its benefits and utility.theurg+sprint
Filip said:
Warlock said:The future of mids and hibs in NF seems pretty Ok.
But what about albs ?
prepare to be surprised.Filip said:i would be soooooooooo supriced if friars ever gonna be a part of a alb gank group ...
2h dam dealer with shitty heals.... they need some godly RA for me to group with a friar in RvR thats for sure...
allso in my exprince having only 1 pbaoer sux.... maybe possible if he is RR10... but as they rarely are 1 is not enough... then rather no paboer
Tholus said:Will hibernia be considered "underpopulated" for keep claim costs?
Skilgannon said:Not a chance. The metric used for defining "underpopulated" considers shroom proliferation. Therefore i fully expect Alb and Mid to be given significantly reduced costs.